>>OTOH, I recall a man who build a "F E" circuit which worked by microwave
radiation from a near by source.


Who?


On 9/1/06, thomas malloy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Wesley Bruce wrote:

> Your overlooking the problem of patents. The patent will not be
> allowed if the theory is disputed and it gets worse if there is no
> theory at

Patents are intended to protect applications.

The discussion about the Steorm machine caused me to recall a patent for
a permanent magnetic mechanical motor. As I recall the patentee's names
were Jines, and Jines. My friend had plans to build a working prototype,
but AFAIK, he has yet to get the job done. The part of the mechanism
that involved shielding the magnet with Mu metal is similar.

I am mystified at the amount of bandwidth which has been expended over
this matter. I realize that if the principals are fraudulent then only
independent replication and testing will definitively answer the
question. However, IMHO, if the "motor" can power a device for an
extended period of time, that's a pretty good indication that it is
performing as promised.

OTOH, I recall a man who build a "F E" circuit which worked by microwave
radiation from a near by source.



--- http://USFamily.Net/dialup.html - $8.25/mo! -- http://www.usfamily.net/dsl.html - $19.99/mo! ---


Reply via email to