Colin!
If you are asking about the CRE approach (?), the answer is Yes, but!,
CRE
does have some limitations and those rap around the difference in AC and
DC.
As most will agree a capacitor is great for passing AC yet is a great
storage device for DC. The CRE uses a capacitor in series with the
charging
(power source) to the electrolyzer and as such you will see the normal
charge, discharge curve of the cap. Yet, during the electrolysis process
when one stops the current flow by removing the source, the action in the
cell does not stop, it will continue for some time (depending on plate
type,
spacing and if AC or DC is being applied). The original CRE's used a
relay
and switched about 0.25 Hz, the current versions use MOSFets and run 600
Hz.
Solid state CRE's run at 50% +/-20%(depends on electrolyte) and on
average
show 135-180% over the sane input using filtered DC. The limitation's) is
(are) proper selection and matching of cell structure (plate spacing and
material), electrolyte, desired gas output and capacitor size and switch
frequency. For high production cells it is not uncommon that you could be
using 1 Farad or more, yet with split cell construction (where produced
gas
is combined) you could obtain the same output with say 5 smaller units
with
each having 1uf cap at a freq of 15,895 Hz. Please don't confuse what is
stated as being some magic number tied to any other way out claim or
idea,
the figure I am stating are from working systems of various configuration
which have different construction parms.
Backing up some, the AC/DC diff comes into play in that the cell sustains
evolution when power is removed, that in effect is the same as a reduced
resistance when the pulses are passed through the cell. Should the pulse
freq be below the cutoff point of the self sustained evolution (due to
ion
build up) then production will drop off sharply. Currently the
StifflerScientifc lab had a simple yet effective CRE running that gets
around the ion cloud around the electrodes. This is seem in a normal cell
as
the current rises at the start to a max point, then declines to the
operational point. The new CRE allows the production to stay at it
highest
point by switching between a special electrode configuration.
CRE makes use of both the AC component and the DC (may will regurgitate
over
this statement) yet it is proven by many systems on the market today that
pulsing does indeed work better (for a number of reasons) than steady
state
DC (NO Stanley Meyer theory here).
Sorry for a simple answer being so long,yet I have worked with many CRE
designs and they are worth looking into.
