The Lesser of Evils. When you hear that phrase, you can bet that 'political expediency' is waiting to take the stage.

There is said to be no humor (and little sanity) in the Biofuel arena- at least in the 'big picture' - especially if it were to 'boil down' the issue to either distilling ethanol from edible grain, or else buying Arab oil (which among other things subsidizes the purchasing the bombs by extremists used to kill our troops, allies and whatever collateral damage is inevitable).

Fortunately, the choice does not 'have to' boil down to that, and therefore, I will give it a shot (the humor aspect - at least cynical-clinical).

Subsidizing ethanol, to be sure, is politically expedient in the largest agriculture economy on the planet, and most instances of political expediency are either unfair (to a segment of society with little political 'pull') or inefficient ... or both, except...

... when the feedstock is sugar-loaded but otherwise worthless (or toxic) as nutritional intake [i.e. Pepsi Cola] ... <g>

There is an ethanol co-op in Los Angeles where they make fuel from expired soda pop [of all kinds]. It cost about $2 per gallon for co-op members. I had thought the shelf life of Pepsi was in the decades, due to the fact that it will not support life as we know it, but apparently not.

Speaking of extended shelf-life... in 1967 my friend found himself in a ditch in Viet Nam surrounded by the bodies of his former platoon, the enemy, and intense hunger on the second day. Scrounging around for something to eat, he found a few tins of recently issued C-rations (affectionately known as sea-rats) which had an expiration date clearly marked: 1946. He survived both life-threatening indignities.

Sadly, this is generally the way the Pentagon often treats our young men who put their lives on the line for "freedom" (our whatever other euphemistic lie we foster on them to go to a hostile land and die) then and now... as evidenced recently by Rumsfeld's part in the body armor fiasco.

BTW - In Taiwan, the translation of the Pepsi slogan, "Come Alive With the Pepsi Generation," came out as, "Pepsi Will Bring Your Ancestors Back From The Dead".

Not quite as brain-dead in the marketing sense as GM-Chevy naming an automobile "Nova" for the Mexican market (no va) but close...

Making biofuel from food crops is also a no-go. I would even say it is morally wrong, given the number of underfed people in Africa and elsewhere. Making biofuels from crop-land is probably morally wrong
as well, even land which was fallow for years.

However making biofuels from trees or ag waste is not objectionable to the majority, or to common sense. 100% of the wood used in paper these days is grown on dedicated land for that purpose, so biodiesel made from trees will not even raise the price of paper. The mountains of Appalachia, Montana, and Western Canada are the perfect place to harvest cellulose for biofuel - but not by clear cutting. Harvesting cellulose from trees can probably best be accomplished - eventually but soon, by robotic pruning of natural growth in old forests - except for the objections of the Sierra Club, a group which often sides with OPEC on such issues. Reverse political expediency, I guess.

Transesterification of vegetable oils has been in use since the mid-1800's for making soap. The "by-products" of this process are methyl esters. Biodiesel is composed of these esters and can be made directly from wood cellulose. Ethyl esters are grain based while methyl esters are wood based. Any source of complex fatty acid can be used to create biodiesel.

Research is also being done into oil production from algae, which could have yields far greater than any feedstock known today. However Algae need their own food source - most of which is found in air and water - but what better than "predigested cellulose" to speed up and synergize the Algae growth process?

..."predigested cellulose" now that'll keep you regular... and allow you to fill up with regular at the pump for 2 bucks a gallon, and provide some dose of 'political expediency' to keep the payola flowing ... but sadly - not as much as allowing farmers to make ethanol from corn.



Reply via email to