Wesley Bruce wrote:
Your overlooking the problem of patents. The patent will not be
allowed if the theory is disputed and it gets worse if there is no
theory at all.
Oh? Read the Takashi motor patent. The claim of overunity was in the
body of the patent, but not in the claims. Too bad it didn't work.
My good drinking buddy, Bill looked at the patent, declared that he had
come up with the same idea in the early '50's, and then asserted that it
was "my patent." I quipped that I hadn't noticed his name any where on
the patent. Later, when Takashi repented of his misguided assertion, I
told Bill that AFAIK he could have the patent.
Steorm wants the patents on this. Peer reviews wont help the reviewers
must have hands on contact. They simply wont believe a paper.
There are several ways to do what needs to be done.
Yah, like a working model that actually powers something. Till then,
their just blowing smoke.
--- http://USFamily.Net/dialup.html - $8.25/mo! --
http://www.usfamily.net/dsl.html - $19.99/mo! ---
