No Harry, 'faith' in logic. Don't get ratty when someone challenges your preconceptions. Extend the argument. Is there something I've missed? Is there a point 3, 4... a way into the argument that Steorn might be on to?
I think not. That's the 1st Law and what it means in a nutshell. When someone challenges one in science, one has to dot the 'i's and cross the 't's unless one has very good experimental evidence. R. -----Original Message----- From: Harry Veeder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 09 September 2006 19:12 To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [Vo]: Remi, > Now when people start talking about violating the *1st Law* it can only > mean: > > 1) The constants of nature have changed over the timescale of your > experiment. > 2) That some new force has been found. Your faith in the first law is strong. Is it stronger than your religious faith? Harry
