Re: Massive new oil find ...

RvS  ...all of 2 years worth.

TB ... More like 1.25 yr @ 20 bbl/yr.


...yet it is still 15 billion barrels recoverable ... so let's put all these numbers into a more general "wealth "perspective, at the current price of around $70, that amounts to one trillion dollars. It will be more by the time it is extracted.

That compares with a current GDP for the USA of about $15 trillion. But what about - compared to national wealth?

Hmm... you may not realize that the USA, because of the Iraq War, is now a net debtor nation, so it could represent all of our national wealth !

Even before Bush's war on Iraq (more like a war on wealth) the federal government was keeping two sets of books. The set the government promotes to the public has a $318 billion deficit in 2005. Bush even called this "healthy" without mentioning the many years of surpluses in the previous administration. And those were probably false surpluses, anyway.

To paraphrase from "America for Sale" by William Norman Grigg, an "audited financial statement produced by the government's own accountants, following "standard accounting rules" instead of spin-doctoring - actually discloses that the real baseline deficit was $760 billion, due mostly to hidden military expenses which were not considered as "costs" but were amortized, or other accounting tricks used by Rumsfeld and the Pentagon. If Rummy were at Enron, he could be in hot-water for that.

And if the cost of Social Security and Medicare were included in the total, as any honest accounting would require, the federal deficit would have been $3.5 trillion (against "all income" not tax income, of $14.5 trillion). Is it any wonder why we have become a net debtor nation ? Thank you, Congress.

BTW ... Enron's Ken lay was convicted of violating accounting rules, among other things, but those corporate transgressions were miniscule compared to what is happening to the books in DC. Is keeping two sets of books OK for Sam but suicidal for Ken? Maybe not... there was a KL sighting recently at a trendy cafe in Dubai. He was reportedly sharing photos and coffee with a skinny pale-faced guy with a fake nose, and wearing one glove <g>.

And back to that $3.5 trillion - it is the annual real deficit - not the national debt. You do not even want to know what that figure really is, if you haven't had breakfast yet, by normal accounting rules, that is. But it would be comparable to the average Joe borrowing about a quarter of his net income *every year* and blowing it for ... what? ... "security against terrorism"?

Even if we used the much lower spin-doctored "public" number - in what sense is a deficit of nearly one-third of a trillion dollars 'healthy' "? Grigg rhetorically asks the President, following his State of the Union address. He continues "In roughly the same sense that congestive heart failure is "healthier" than a sucking chest wound: Both are lethal if untreated, but the latter will kill more quickly." "We're a bottom-line culture, and we've been hiding the bottom line from the American people," complains Rep. Jim Cooper, former investment banker, who has offered a draft resolution - supported by congressmen on both sides of the aisle - but vehemently opposed by Bush: to require the White House to include audited spending and deficit numbers in his budget proposals.

"It's not fair to [the people], and it's delusional on our part." ... that Washington has invested heavily in the preservation of such a false accounting system that Rep. Cooper's proposal for honest accounting wasn't even considered by the Senate's leadership. Grigg is right-on - and that is just a true no matter who or which party ends up in the White House next time.

Anyway, if that massive new oil find is real, it may be all we have going for us these days, wealth-wise ... or is that un-wise ? given that next year we will have to borrow against that oil find to keep troops in hostile lands ?

And yet, personally, it all makes me wonder how and why do I remains so optimistic?

Jones



Reply via email to