first off, how does this give evidence of an abiotic source?  im
missing something.

second, even if true, its formed very very slowly.  meaning we WILL run out.

On 9/12/06, Harry Veeder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Massive oil field found under Gulf

Reserves south of New Orleans could rival
North Slope, boosting U.S. supplies by 50%

http://www.wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=51837

Chevron and two oil exploration companies announced the discovery of a giant
oil reserve in the Gulf of Mexico that could boost the nation's supplies by
as much as 50 percent and provide compelling evidence oil is a plentiful
deep-earth product made naturally on a continuous basis.

Known as the Jack Field, the reserve – some 270 miles southwest of New
Orleans – is estimated to hold as much as 15 billion barrels of oil.

Authors Jerome R. Corsi and Craig R. Smith say the giant find validates the
key thesis of their book, "Black Gold Stranglehold: The Myth of Scarcity and
the Politics of Oil ," that oil did not come from the remains of ancient
plant and animal life but is made naturally by the Earth.

"We have always rejected the theories that oil and natural gas are
biological products," Corsi told WND. "Chevron's find in the Gulf of Mexico
validates our argument that the Gulf is a huge resource for finding oil and
natural gas."

The Wall Street Journal reports today the find could boost the nation's
current reserves of 29.3 billion barrels by as much as 50 percent.

Chevron discovered the field by drilling the deepest to date in the Gulf of
Mexico, down 28,175 feet in waters nearly 7,000 feet deep, some seven miles
below the surface of the Earth.

The second biggest source of oil in the world is Mexico's giant Cantarell
field in the Gulf of Mexico near the Yucatan Peninsula. It was discovered in
1976, supposedly after a fisherman named Cantarell reported an oil seep in
Campeche Bay.

In March, Mexico announced the discovery of a field that could be larger
than Cantarell, the Noxal field in the Gulf of Mexico off Veracruz.

In "Black Gold Stranglehold," Corsi and Smith argued the theory developed in
the Soviet Union in the 1950s by Prof. Nikolai Kudryavtsev that oil is a
deep-earth, abiotic product. The theory, the authors wrote, "rejected the
contention that oil was formed from the remains of ancient plant and animal
life that died millions of years ago. According to Kudryavtsev, oil had
nothing to do with the unproved concept of a boggy primeval forest rotting
into petroleum. The Soviet scientist ridiculed the idea that an ancient
primeval morass of plant and animal remains was covered by sedimentary
deposits over millions of years, compressed by millions of more years of
heat and pressure."

Instead, the abiotic theory argued "oil should be seen as a primordial
material that the earth forms and exudes on a continual basis."

Corsi and Smith directly challenge the "peak oil" theory advanced in 1956 by
Shell Oil's M. King Hubbert.

In an interview with WND, Smith posed the following question: "If U.S.
proven oil reserves can be increased by 50 percent with one deep-earth oil
find in the Gulf of Mexico, who knows how much oil might be found as the
technology of deep-water drilling advances and becomes even more
economically feasible?"

In "Black Gold Stranglehold," Corsi and Smith note the importance of the
abiotic theory:

The thought that oil might be naturally produced on a regular basis, that
oil itself might be a renewable resource, is very threatening to those who
have invested their minds into believing that oil is fossil fuel. The
logical consequence of the fossil fuel theory of oil has always been that we
will run out of oil. After all, there could only be a finite number of
ancient forests available to rot into oil. Ancient forests, even if once
plentiful, are a finite resource that by definition will become exhausted
after they are fully explored and their oil harvested. The logic of the
fossil fuel theory is that inevitably we will run out of oil.

Corsi and Smith note the power of the abiotic theory: "Could it be that oil
is abundant, nearly an inexhaustible resource, if only we drill deep
enough?"

Prior to the Jack Field discovery, the largest U.S. oil find in the Gulf of
Mexico has been the Thunder Horse , about 125 miles southeast of New
Orleans. British Petroleum holds a 75-percent interest with ExxonMobil to
develop the Thunder Horse. This field, too, is deep-earth oil, with BP and
ExxonMobil finding oil under one mile of water and five miles below the
seabed.

Scientists believe Mexico's richest oil field complex was created when the
prehistoric, massive Chicxulub meteor impacted the Earth.

"Could it be that the Chicxulub meteor deeply fractured the entire bedrock
under the Gulf of Mexico?" Corsi asked in a WND interview. "If so, we might
find abundant oil wherever we look as we begin to explore the deeper waters
of the Gulf."

Earlier this year, Cuba announced plans to hire the communist Chinese to
drill for oil some 45 miles off the shores of Florida. This move was made
possible by the 1977 agreement under President Jimmy Carter that created for
Cuba an "Exclusive Economic Zone" extending from the country's western tip
to the north, virtually to Key West, Fla.

"If Cuba and communist China believe they too can find oil in the Gulf, we
should pull out all stops," argues Smith. "We may be able to bring the price
of gasoline down under two dollars a gallon if oil can be found in these
huge quantities within our territorial waters. It's crazy to think we should
be dependent on foreign oil when we've made Mexico our number two supplier
of oil with the reserves Mexico has found in the Gulf."

"Thomas Gold should feel vindicated today," Corsi added, referring to the
Cornell University astronomer who in 1998 published "The Deep Hot Biosphere:
The Myth of Fossil Fuels," a book that also challenged the conventional
wisdom on the origin of oil.

"As an astronomer reading spectrographs," Corsi noted, "Gold knew that
hydrocarbon products such as methane are abundant in our solar system. Gold
knew that the abundant methane on Titan, the giant moon of Saturn, did not
get formed by little dinosaurs up on Titan, or by any other kind of
biological material. So far as we know, nothing living has ever been found
on Titan."





--
That which yields isn't always weak.

Reply via email to