Robin
Actually, there is no need for any technology at all. What
hydrinos there are will eventually come down in the rain. All
you
have to do is collect the rain water.
This is possible, sure, but lately it is seeming less likely that
they would appear in PPM quantities in water, or even PPB
quantities. The relative percentage is most important if they are
to become an energy resource. I'm surprised you didn't mention the
"faux-D" possibility, or were you waiting for the proper segue?
Look at heavy water. Heavy water is rather pricey already - and
deuterium in water may be hundreds of times more common than
hydrinos. In fact, for those who have not heard of Robin's
hypothesis - it is clearly possible that some of the deuterium
which is there already - either came from hydrinos originally, or
IS hydrino-based rather than a real neutron, as the small
differences in physical properties would be barely discernable,
except perhaps that the hydrino-based faux-D is the kind of
deuterium which is more easily stipped, as in the
Oppenheimer-Phillips reaction. But that is most like a tiny
percentabe of all deuterium - so the cost would likely be ...
err... "astronomical" ?
It is the scarcity and the cost of enrichment which could make the
Hydrino Harvester attractive, as an alternative. Even having to go
up 60 miles in the polar regions to accomplish this - as expensive
as that is - it could easily be the low cost option - who knows
without more data ?
Very thorough mass spec measurements have regualry taken on water
from amny areas since the cold war, especially rain water, to look
for traces of atomic bomb testing and other things in PPB
quantities, and there would likely have been some indication from
that kind of very thorough testing, if much were to be found,
outside of the faux-D possibility. The more you research this kind
of thing; the less likely it appears that affordable quantities
are available in rain water- quantities which can be enriched at a
cost comparable to that of tritium for instance.
Jones
