|
Jones wrote
Below the sun's surface, in the fusion zone there will likely be a
monstrous positive charge bias, which keeps this area far
less-dense
than it otherwise should be, if only gravity were at
work. Electrostatic
repulsion is in constant battle with gravity
there. The resultant charge
layering makes the structure like a
giant capacitor, and on the surface and
in the corona, you will
have a corresponding negative charge bias, to
balance out the
positive bias below - and many surplus electrons, which
probably
are "paired" for substantial statistical time periods (even if it
is nanoseconds as paired and femptoseconds as sequentially
unpaired) -
since there is also a gigantic magnetic field and a
gigantic gravity field,
with which to structure this kind of
persistent electron pairing - which is
highly favored by electrons
anyway......
if protons from the flare are
moving fast enough to exit the
gravity field alone, or to capture
a single electron and exit into the solar
wind, then they provides
the bulk of this wind, and the single electron
capture would
provide perhaps the remaining 5-10% of solar heating. The
stable
hydrino-hydride, in contrast will be ejected electrostatically,
but at a much slower pace both in numbers and in velocity. The Hy-
may
move at less than one percent of the speed of the bulk of
solar
wind.
Howdy Jones,
I suggest the mind picture is blurred by the use of the wording " solar
wind". Unforunately, sometime in the past the event was named "solar wind"
and has "misdirected " science since.
A mind picture of a robus strip shaped torus would better fit the frame for
reference. It may be possible to design an experiment to demonstate if the
"solar wind" actually inverts . Picture the Indianapolis speedway track
reshaped into a robus strip and watch the race cars run past heading
east and watch them return from the west, yet never meet together in a
collision.
The magnificent " capacitor "fits" the mind picture .. however..
Richard
| 
