Glad you're finally getting through, Michel.

BTW. Harry tends to lay down on the job so to speak, hence 
assumes what WalMart calls their "entry level" position.

OTOH, I hear that missionary positions abound in Amsterdam
if you tend to have a religious bent.

Fred


> [Original Message]
> From: Michel Jullian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[email protected]>
> Date: 11/24/2006 2:54:25 AM
> Subject: Re: [Vo]: weight and charge
>
> LOL
>
> BTW my posts to Vortex are getting through again since I swapped ISP's, I
am quite glad. Maybe the list server is equipped with some whimsical
antispam software blocking all posts from my previous ISP's smtp server?
>
> Michel
>
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Frederick Sparber" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[email protected]>
> Sent: Friday, November 24, 2006 10:20 AM
> Subject: Re: [Vo]: weight and charge
>
>
> > Harry wasn't kidding Michel. He knows this from his experience 
> > moonlighting as a speed-bump at WalMart.
> > 
> > Fred 
> > 
> >> [Original Message]
> >> From: Michel Jullian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >> To: <[email protected]>
> >> Date: 11/24/2006 2:00:09 AM
> >> Subject: Re: [Vo]: weight and charge
> >>
> >> I guess Harry was teasing us by referring to apparent weight = weight
> > minus centrifugal force. This obviously can be zero when traveling at
the
> > right velocity over the surface of the Earth, in the same way as people
in
> > orbit or in free fall are weightless, but only apparently since they
> > obviously still experience the Earth's gravitational attraction
(weight).
> >>
> >> Michel
> >>
> >> ----- Original Message ----- 
> >> From: "Robin van Spaandonk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >> To: <[email protected]>
> >> Sent: Friday, November 24, 2006 3:14 AM
> >> Subject: Re: [Vo]: weight and charge
> >>
> >>
> >> > In reply to  Harry Veeder's message of Thu, 23 Nov 2006 14:25:19
> >> > -0500:
> >> > Hi,
> >> > [snip]
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>If charged particles have weight then they would weigh less when
> >> >>moving in a horizontal plane.
> >> >>
> >> >>Why? Because the faster you travel over the surface of the Earth, the
> > less
> >> >>you weigh.
> >> >>Weight is maximum when you are not travelling.
> >> >>Weight is minimum ( ~ zero ) when you are travelling at ~ 17000 mph.
> >> >>
> >> >>Harry
> >> > 
> >> > Charged particles obviously have weight. Everything is made of
> >> > them.
> >> > 
> >> > Regards,
> >> > 
> >> > Robin van Spaandonk
> >> > 
> >> > http://users.bigpond.net.au/rvanspaa/
> >> > 
> >> > Competition provides the motivation,
> >> > Cooperation provides the means.
> >> >
> > 
> > 
> >
>



Reply via email to