On 11/24/06, Jones Beene <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

OK for the record, TB is being sarcastic - yes, that generator may
have turned out to be only 50% efficient at very low speed, but is
still has very high efficiency potential - at anything above a
snail's pace - not my fault!

Not scarcism, please!

No, you misunderstand, true appreciation since we had found nothing
which was comparable.  (The humor is in the name "Ecosmart".)

http://www.ecosmart.com

Terry asked me to recommend a high efficiency generator, and I
sent him the idea and info on rewinding the Ecosmart, which he
did. As have others - it is an excellent low cost generator for
home windmills etc.

This motor is made by Fisher & Paykel in OZ but available here for
a fair price. At even 1000 RPM they have told me the generator
should be 95% eff.  - but hey - Terry wanted to run it a less than
100 RPM ! and without gearing it up !

Ackshully, NZ; but, that could be OZ, too.

It is directly driven at 90 RPM; and, I truly believe that it is the
best that we could have achieved without a custom built gen.


Bad Idea. Many motors have very high drop-offs in eff. when run
out of spec and - worst of all - it would have been relatively
easy to gear this thing up with two bicycle sprocket-pairs and
chains - if it had been done from the git-go - which they never
did. Pity because this generator coulda/shoulda been enough to
allow self-power --- if--- that is, Sprain truly does have that
much COP margin to play with (despite Terry's formidable skills, I
am not convinced of that large margin from what I've seen on the
site he has referenced).

Be patient, Jones.  My only challenge at this point is the inductance
of the 45# custom built EM.  But with only 84 mH inductance and 12 ohm
resistance, the rise time is only twice the earlier EM, 7 ms.

But then again, nobody slows/tells everything...

Sign the NDA and you will know all.  But, it might conflict with your
earlier committments.

Terry

Reply via email to