RC Macaulay wrote:
Thomas wrote..
Phil contends that if
we had spent the same money on energy development, we'd have energy
independence. I think that if the Powers That Be wanted us to have
energy independence we'd be energy independent.
Howdy Thomas,
One must understand there has been an irrevocable change since WW2.
Now the focus is on melding and merging the world populace in phases.
We are somewhere between the 1st and 2nd phase which can be described
as socio market spheres like UCM and NAFTA. Energy is one of the major
components for the success of this planning. It is being used both as
a triggering mechanism and a lure.
So Richard, how many steps do you think that there are? I think that we
are nearing the end of the road.
The US can be energy independent when you think about it. All that's
necessary is to convert from autos getting 20 mpg to 100 mpg and turn
off all the lights at night. Ask yourself what is preventing this and
why an energy policy has not been made.
I'm reminded of the E85 vehicle not being able to burn methanol, which
could be made from coal. Yesterday I noticed that the top management at
GM got rid of that meddlesome trouble maker, Kurt Kirkorian who finished
liquidating his stock this week.
It's because it does not serve the interests of the players in the
great game. The SD's like Buffett may appear as guiding the economy
but the real power lies in the hands of the people guiding the
bureaucracy inside the beltway.
The Powers That Be are invisible. Except to those of us who follow
their activities.
--- http://USFamily.Net/dialup.html - $8.25/mo! --
http://www.usfamily.net/dsl.html - $19.99/mo! ---
