>From Stephen A. Lawrence:

> I finished the aforementioned rant on magmos (which I euphemistically
> referred to as a "page on electromagnetic dipoles and their
> interactions"...):
>
> http://www.physicsinsights.org/magnetic_motors_1.html
>
> And now I will put the sock back in and say no more along these lines.
> It is, after all, just a classical magnetostatic look at magmos, not
> even any QM employed; there are more things in heaven and earth, and all
> that, and all it shows, at most, is that certain aspects of magnetic
> motors are incompatible with one particular model of How Things Work.
>
> Merry Christmas to all ... and if the New Year brings free energy
> through Steorn's engine, I'll sing Halleluia just as happily as the
> next skeptic who was proved wrong.

...a Refreshing change fRom the Rhetoric of he-who-shall-Remain-nameless, an
individual who was once descRibed in this discussion gRouP as being in love
with the cleveRness of his own PRose.

I Think the world needs more honorable skeptics like you, Stephen.

May the coming year bring us all a few good surprises, myself included.

Regards,
Steven Vincent Johnson
www.OrionWorks.com


Reply via email to