[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 > Diode arrays may get us out of the poor polluted
and pitiful energy
 > situation. On http://www.freewebs.com/diodearray   
I list more serious
 > versions of the novelties listed at Vo: The
possibilities are so great
 > that they are hard to restrain. Broadcasters would
appreciate high
 > altitude transmitting stationary aircraft.
Pedestrians would benefit
 > from snow and ice free heated sidewalks or,
perhaps, more practically,
 > heated footwear. We can also insulate more if
fiberglass wool can be
 > made and installed more cheaply. However, high
bypass heating or air
 > conditioning would provide fresher air. Diode
arrays do not produce or
 > eliminate energy but they may convert
conventionally dead heat into
 > efficiently usable electricity. Diode arrays may be
powerful enough to
 > power a fuelless heavier than air aircraft.
Alternately cheap energy
 > could be used to loft roadways of light strong
materials in the air on
 > fans. Dispersed lights operating on absorbed heat
in oilge vats would
 > increase the productivity of those besties.
 > Aloha,  Charlie



Hi Charlie,

Your Diode array is very doable with present
technology.  I know for 
fact an LED will generate photons when connected to a
large carbon 
composite resistor. An LED will generate photons at
*any* voltage level, 
even though they're far more efficient at the forward
voltage. 
Furthermore, there is no upper voltage crest limit to
thermal noise. 
That is "free energy," but an infinitesimal amount.
It's just a noisy R 
and high-speed wide bandwidth LED in series. It is
possible to fit 
billions of such LED's and R's in a small area, which
would generate a 
significant amount of light. Also note that voltage
noise from composite 
resistors increase with a decrease in size; e.g., a 1
micron 1 Gohm R 
generates more noise than a 1" 1 Gohm R.

It is amazing how many physicists believe or want you
to believe it is 
impossible to extract energy from a moving object,
such as an atom. 
I've analyzed people in the "free energy" industry. 
It's odd how most 
avoid realistic and potential "free energy" designs
and research.  :-(

Here's a thought Charlie. What could a multi
billionaire do to prevent 
their life, their livelihood, their billions of
dollars from going down 
the drain from "free energy?"  Hmm, how about legally
hire teams of 
people to flood the "free energy" community for the
purpose of 
distracting real research.

Keep up the good work Charlie and don't give up. :-) 
It seems companies 
are avoiding your diode array like the plague.
Therefore, perhaps you 
could save up some money have a small array of LED's
and R's built.  I 
think the public would be very interested if you had a
device that 
continuously generated light without any input. You
could create a web 
cam of the array. Eventually the media will become
interested, which 
should spark enough interest.


Regards,
Paul


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 

Reply via email to