With both links all I get is "Your search - 300*( (1+ NREjoulesPerDay /10^22)^0.25-1) - did not match any documents."
Is it because I use internet explorer 5.1 ? Harry Michel Jullian wrote: > Try this shorter link: http://tinyurl.com/vcusf > and don't forget to replace "NREjoulesPerDay" by a numerical value or > expression in the Google search box. > > For 10,000 times less NRE use than today you'll find no significant global > cooling, because our present actual heat contribution is negligible compared > to the Sun's. In the present global warming episode we provide the thermal > insulation as the byproduct of a tiny bit of the heating, the Sun provides the > bulk of the heating. In my computation I assume the excess greenhouse gas > problem has been solved. > > Michel > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Harry Veeder" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[email protected]> > Sent: Monday, January 15, 2007 9:18 PM > Subject: Re: [Vo]: NRE induced global warming calculator > > >> >> Neat, but the calculator doesn't seem to work on my browser. >> >> Anyway, all else being equal, how much cooler would the temperature be if we >> used 10,000 times less energy? >> >> Harry >> >> Michel Jullian wrote: >> >>> I made this "online calculator" to estimate the global warming induced by >>> NRE >>> use (Non Renewable Energy): >>> >>> http://www.google.com/search?q=300*%28+%281%2B++NREjoulesPerDay++%2F10%5E22% >>> 29 >>> %5E0.25-1%29 >>> >>> 1/ Click the link, ignore the results and double-click "NREjoulesPerDay" in >>> the search box to replace it by your projected value >>> >>> 2/ Click "Search" to get the corresponding global warming in °C. >>> >>> For example if you enter 100*1.2*10^18 (100 times the 2003 daily global >>> energy >>> consumption, note that if we all had merely consumed as much energy per >>> capita >>> as the Qatari that year we would have multiplied it by 13 already!) you get >>> 0.9°C. >>> >>> Almost 1°C is not benign, for a consumption boost factor which doesn't seem >>> unrealistic in the event of a new source of inexpensive NRE (hot fusion, >>> cold >>> fusion, a new type of cheap fission, hydrinos, ZPE, whatever). >>> >>> Share and enjoy, >>> -- >>> Michel >>> >>> P.S. The formula is straightforwardly derived from the Stefan-Boltzmann >>> fourth >>> power of T black body radiation formula, assuming: >>> - _ZERO_ excess of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere >>> - 300K present global average temperature >>> - 240W/m2 average absorbed (and therefore re-radiated) solar energy: 1370/4 >>> = >>> 340W incident per m2, minus 100W/m2 reflected (30%), yielding 10^22 J/day >>> for >>> the total globe surface area. >>> >> >> >
