----- Original Message ----- From: "Paul" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Wednesday, January 24, 2007 3:46 PM Subject: Re: [Vo]: Energy *Violations* using *standard* physics
> Michel Jullian wrote: > > Indeed both kinetic and magnetic field energies are > increasing in the process. Is this > a violation of energy conservation? No. Electric > potential energy is decreasing somewhere, > I'll let you find where :) > > > > Michel > > > The old "I know, but I don't want to tell you" trick? > :) Not at all, I will give the answer eventually, say on Sunday if nobody finds it before, which I doubt very much. The fun is in the searching, I have given away far too much already :) Your variations don't change the issue BTW, so let's stick to your original experiment. Michel You are incorrect. The change > in E-field energy can greatly *vary* depending upon > the variation of the test. Here are > two variations that clearly demonstrates all three > (Kinetic, Magnetic, and Electric) > energies increase --> > > Variation #1: > Two separated permanent magnets. Each magnet is > *slightly* negatively charged. :-) > Magnets are released, in which both accelerate toward > each other in a linear and angular > fashion due to the overwhelming magnetic attraction. > This results in a gain in kinetic, > magnetic, and electric energy. :-)) The gain in > electric energy is due to the fact that > we are forcing electrons closer to each other. Work > is force times distance. > Furthermore, the net E-field increases as the two > objects approach each other. > > Variation #2: > And the final blow to your theory (no offense > intended) is the fact that two electromagnet > dipoles that accelerate toward each other > ***consumes*** energy from the current source, > especially if you negatively or positively charge both > electromagnets. This clearly > demonstrates the entire *net* process requires energy. > > > > Regards, > Paul Lowrance > > > > > ____________________________________________________________________________________ > Sucker-punch spam with award-winning protection. > Try the free Yahoo! Mail Beta. > http://advision.webevents.yahoo.com/mailbeta/features_spam.html >
