Paul wrote: > Variation #2: > And the final blow to your theory (no offense > intended) is the fact that two electromagnet > dipoles that accelerate toward each other > ***consumes*** energy from the current source, > especially if you negatively or positively charge both > electromagnets. This clearly > demonstrates the entire *net* process requires energy. >
... or that for this instance of acceleration, a supply of "energy" is not required by nature. Must nature require energy whenever we require energy? Must nature always mirror our classical/quantum mechanical fantasies of her? Harry
