Paul wrote:
Michel Jullian wrote:
> Paul, I suggest you try and do some simple physics
derivations (analytically) without
> the help of PE, and post them here. Max speed
reached by the ball in a pendulum released
> at an angle of 90° from the vertical as a function
of string length, this kind of stuff.
I've adapted my own style of physics and retired the
pen and paper, lol. IMHO the future
of physics is computer software. Computers are best
at mathematics, speed, and memory. I
view the Omniverse as one large computer. As far as
PE, my present simulation software
has no such magical PE. What I've described here at
vortex is one thing, but only if you
could experience what I've experienced through
simulations. For example, it is well known
that the electron is expressed in Ampere-Meter^2.
Therefore what else are you going to
use to simulate electron spin? Well, it turns out
such current-loops form a magnetic
dipole moment in space. Furthermore two current-loops
rotate facing each other while
accelerating toward each. Last, but not least, there
exists opposing induced voltage on
the current-loops, which consumes energy from such
current-loops. The amount of energy
consumed from such current-loops equals the gained KE
and increase in field. There's no
real way getting around it in terms of simulation.
That completely eliminates the need
for such PE. :-)
But that's kind of the point, isn't it? That DOESN'T WORK for
electrons, because they don't slow down, the current doesn't reduce,
there's no battery attached to them (that we can see), and any
hypothetical "back EMF" in the electron's imagined "current loop" has no
effect.
If you eliminate the PE then you need to provide the energy from some
other source.
You can model an electron as one electric monopole and two magnetic
monopoles, and that works just as well as modeling it as an electric
monopole and a current loop. The current loop model just seems more
familiar.
