OK - Lets assume that Ron Stiffler's device is robustly OU and is replicated by others. Here is why I think that any OU which is produced in could be *nuclear* in origin.

But it's not the kind of "nuclear" which you had in mind. More specifically, in the past this little-known reaction has been called IPE or IGE. I have posted on this reaction before - may be it is in the archives, or maybe it was to another forum.

1) First off - in getting a proper handle on this situation, there is the "nuclear isomer." This is an isotope but not an isotope which will decay in the usual way, but it has an irregular or distorted nucleus.

A nuclear isomer is a metastable state of an atomic nucleus caused by the long-term excitation of one or more of its protons or neutrons or both, but not strong enough to destroy it. A nuclear isomer occupies a higher energy state than the corresponding non-excited isotope. The nuclear isomer will sooner or later, often under stimulation, release the extra energy and decay back down to the ground state. Usually the release is a gamma. Barium may be different in that regard.

2)Some time ago, it was clear that the US was developing a new kind of quasi-nuclear weapon, the hafnium bomb (16 August 2003, p 4 "New Scientist" - and others). This weapon relies not on fission or fusion, but on triggering the release of excess energy stored in the distorted nucleus of the isotope hafnium-178, specifically its isomer known as hafnium-178m2. This isomer releases a strong gamma.

3) Barium has such an isomer called Ba-135m. 135Ba is itself about 6.6% of all barium and the isomer is a fraction of that which depends on how long, and how "hot" was the ore from which the barium was extracted. Barium ore invariably contains some radium. The gamma of barium is not all that strong, as with hafnium, or else the military would already be using it instead - as there is orders of magnitude more barium than halfnium. Also, halfnium with a high level of activity can be extracted from control rods which were used on nuclear submarines - thus it is almost a waste product.

4)It is possible that the metastable state of Barium can also be induced by HV.

The nuclear isomer is technically radioactive, emitting its excess energy as a gamma ray, but it does not change the identity (nuclear Z) as do normal alpha or beta releases.

The Pentagon was supposedly developing a way to trigger coordinated decay hafnium nuclei at once, using a conventional trigger and producing an explosive burst of gamma rays thousands of times more powerful than any conventional explosives but less than a standard nuclear weapon. Because the hafnium bomb would not involve fission or fusion, or residual radioactivity it might have been able to slip through a loophole in US law banning development of mini-nukes. This weapon may have already been used in Afghanistan because of its penetrating power. It wouldn't surprise me if you-know-who was fried to a crisp years ago in some cave.

Back to peaceful uses - I think that this barium isomer effect may also have one added feature of extreme importance for the future - and this puts it into the same category as CF itself.

Instead of a single gamma release (~270 keV) - the metastable energy is released more slowly the phonon structure - and in smaller bursts - probably at the frequency of 1.6 MHz.

There you have it... <G>

R. Stiffler may have invented "The worlds smallest nuclear reactor" ... and you thought I was "pulling your leg," didn't you, Ron?

Jones

Stiffler Scientific wrote:
Yes! Yes!. Energy increase of 10k over 20khz and 40khz in transducer
effectiveness in sonoluminesce. Used now in vaporizers, is
spectrophotometer, etc,. etc., but used for specialized application and to
my knowledge no one has yet seen how it can be used to crack a very sought
after secret.


Because it is also a common frequency found in piezo-ceramics,
esp containing barium, it is the most common of the high
ultrasonic frequency spectrum seen in those transducers. Also see
Steve Krivit's report of the Stringham device at the LA  APS a
few years ago.

Reply via email to