Frederick Sparber wrote:
If it wasn't for the cost I would use at least three VDGs for getting
a multipole field configuration to see how it interacts with the
earth-ionosphere charges.
Fred, there is a most interesting convergence of ideas going-on here
that might push your experiment "higher" so-to-speak, in anti-gravity terms.
I am referring to the three-way collection of postings over the weekend
regarding "Energy Violations" and "Circuit cries Foul" and VDG/AG etc.
Did you catch that there is this glaring overlap, once you tun into the
details, in those threads with what you are doing?
Ultimately, I am suggesting the possibility of adding an Avramenko's
Plug 'type' of Free Electron Pump to operate in tandem with a VDG:
http://jnaudin.free.fr/html/afep01.htm
The might allow the two operate with synergism, to wit:
Any motion of charge is electric current by definition, even if the
motion is relatively minor compared to the potential. The electric
potential field can move charge; especially in an AC or pulsed DC
situation and this results in "free" work or energy, but of a strange
sort, which I think that this is where the possible overlap between all
of these recent threads on Vortex lies. It is (probably) enough to use
the electrical field (scalar potential source) to create the power and
work in an electric load circuit, which is then recycled back, with some
added electrons drawn in from ambient. This could be autocatalytic.
But bordering on this is the semantic quandary: which Frolov/Bearden
state something to the effect that there are both the "wattful" current
and "wattless" current. Almost brings a smiley out, doesn't it. To
create the so-called "free energy system," then, it is necessary to
transform the wattless current to wattful current - but that might be
only possible in an "in situ" situation, resulting in antigravity as the
end product. Almost brings a bigger smiley out, doesn't it.
This kind of lingo: OU-speak - will turn many EEs (not Terry) to mush
but nevertheless, this is the same kind of thing one hears regarding
"cold electricity" and "Radiant energy" in other circles. The point
being that there is a "special kind" of EMF available in nature, which
is not exactly watt-denominated (so to speak). It is not exactly
electrostatic either. This is the crux of the Tesla controversy.
I urge you to look into this possibility as an altenative (and cheaper
way) instead of adding another VDG. Especially note that Naudin's
version of the plug with an automotive ignition coil, or a lighter
weight version, might operate kind of as an intermediary system, even
though I suspect that the barium ferrite antennas of Dr. Stiffler are
adding something special also, in the way of usable EMF. IOW you would
not need to add more power, just kind of a "reverse VDG" - if you catch
my drift.
But the bottom line is that so long as your gram-scale can accomodate
the added weight, you might be able to combine many of these
hypothetical ideas - although to be honest - the best approach to doing
this is not clear.
Make sure that there is no one on you roof at the time you fire it up <g>.
Jones
