Indeed the double slit experiment with only one single photon or electron traversing the experiment at a time is an awesome proof of the shortcomings of our common sense (mine in any case)! Can anyone _really_ make sense of why they form interference patterns? I mean, the QM equations will yield those patterns all right, but does QM itself make common sense?
Michel ----- Original Message ----- From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Wednesday, January 31, 2007 7:51 PM Subject: Re: [Vo]: Energy *Violations* using *standard* physics > David Thomson wrote: > > Hi Paul, > > > > > >> Here's an interesting 4-dimensional vortex of an atom. The flat plane > >> slicing through the center would be the 3-dimensions; i.e., where the > >> two vortexes meet. > >> http://www.unarius.org/plasma/vortex.gif > > > > This is a very nice image. > > > > Those are great questions. I'm still in the process of trying to > untangle the information since it's from a metaphysic source. Being > open-minded I'm studying the source because most of the information > meshes very well with my thoughts on reality. I would highly recommend > one of their books. At 540 pages, hardback, it's a bargain for $0.25. > Yes, that's 25 cents plus $2.50 S&H, tax free. :-) Actually there's > another guy on ebay selling it for one penny, but $3.50 S&H. > > Title: Infinite Concept of Cosmic Creation > > http://cgi.ebay.com/Infinite-Concept-of-Cosmic-Creation-by-Ernest-L-Nor_W0QQitemZ110065440758QQihZ001QQcategoryZ378QQrdZ1QQssPageNameZWD1VQQcmdZViewItem > > http://search.ebay.com/search/search.dll?cgiurl=http%3A%2F%2Fcgi.ebay.com%2Fws%2F&fkr=1&from=R8&satitle=%22infinite+concept+of+cosmic+creation%22&category0=&submitSearch=Search > > Note this book was published in 1956! > > Roughly 20 years ago I glanced through the book, and truly such > information did not mess as well, and therefore went over my head. Last > month I glanced through the book and was surprised at how much > information made more sense, but left it at that. A few days ago I once > again glanced through the book and was shocked at the connections I'm > unraveling. Most of such connections were ignited by my recent physics > simulation research. Every day I become more amazed ... no, dumb > founded how nature (our universe) accomplishes things, at its > intelligence. It's nearly impossible to describe unless one delves deep > in the attempts of simulating nature. There are various problems that > seem so overwhelmingly impossible to overcome, yet nature accomplishes > such tasks on a grand scale, infinity so. Is there truly an upper limit > how large reality is? Seems not. Is there a lower limit how small > things are? Look at the biggest thing in physics theory now, M-theory. > Seems there's no limit. Hypothetically lets say there is a limit, even > though there's probably not. Would it resemble raw information as in > memory? Trying to simulate a small area of such raw memory is difficult > enough. Multiply that by infinity. It blows me away!! > > Here's an *attempt* to answer some of your questions. > > > > > > Are all the dimensions length dimensions? > > What is the mathematical and > > physical basis for the spirals coming out of the poles? > > > > I am aware there is a twist in the magnetic field at the poles, as can be > > readily seen when placing a magnet near a CRT screen. But it does > not seem > > to exhibit the number of turns in the drawing. > > > I'm not sure how to answer since the author states time and space in our > physical universe is misunderstood. In the book there's a drawing of > space and time, which is drawn as a sine wave. It shows one unit of > "space factor" to be one wavelength. I believe what they call "space > factor" is the smallest unit of distance in our physical universe. They > continue with, "Time factor energy moving from A to B, or 1/2 wave" > Now I understand that bit of information is most likely totally > meaningless to you. It's only when you juggle thousands of such > statements taken from the book that you begin to perceive a glimpse how > it all makes sense. In a nutshell it's claimed that velocity, time, > speed are 3-dimensional illusions. That what we experience is an > artifact of 3-dimensions. In such 3-dimensions space and time are > split, but when viewed from the 4th and higher dimensions space and time > is connected. For example, when viewing the atom from at least > 4-dimensions they claim the atoms energy wave traverses somewhat like a > circle, similar to how planets circle the sun, except we are dealing > with wave patterns. They claim light from distant stars travels here in > an instant. That's just a tidbit from the book, written in 1956. Today > there are well acknowledged physicists who adhere to the interpretation > that photons do not travel through space, but the actual energy exchange > occurs instantly. Have you studied the double slit single electron or > single photon experiments? It appears the only theory to predict such > experiments by messing with time. > > The book continually refers to 4th, 5th, and higher dimensional > vortexes. Also there's a lot of talk about 2X and 1/2X harmonics, > induction, hysteresis, how energy is transferred and split by these > methods from the higher dimensions to lower. I could go on and on > mentioning various effects describe in the book such as polarity > reversals, to EMF bands, to how gravity works. All I can say is that > it's very interesting, and it would take such a bizarre theory to > explain experiments such as the double slit. > > > > Regards, > Paul Lowrance >
