In most cases the quality can't be judged by just reading a paper, so such ranking by the readers would be worthless IMHO.
But a ranking scheme might work if it was done by the fellow CF researchers, so they wouldn't have to "tell" about erroneous experiments made by friends, they would just not rank them or give them a lower ranking. Then replicators could concentrate on the most promising experiments rather than wasting their time and money in dead alleys. How does this sound Jed? Michel ----- Original Message ----- From: "Harry Veeder" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Saturday, February 10, 2007 10:41 AM Subject: Re: [Vo]: Empathy (was Re: More about the skeptics' mindsets) > > Jed...You could also let readers rank the quality of the experiments > on your website. > > Harry > >
