BlankHowdy Vorts,

Lurking between the thoughts posted on this subject are grains of wisdom. 
Considering that the word "cold fusion" can provoke much debate. Some view the 
word similar to " con-fusion" and some others " il-lusion" while others as 
"de-lusion" or "pro-fusion".
The debate  can  even be "a-musing" were it not for the seriousness of the need 
for clean forms of energy.

Not being a particle physicist, I study the "elements" of the words for 
insight. The elements are faith and hope conjured and mixed with jealously, 
vanity, lust and greed. Oh! what a witches brew.

The good news is that good science will emerge because of the energy expended 
in both theory and experiment versus controversy and suspicion. To paraphase 
ole Carysle.. "science character is tempered in the fires of adversity" where 
jealousy can succumb to greed and vanity to lust or visa-verse, depending on 
the quality of the instrument used to probe the depth. 

Ooops! That thought can take on the sensual.... however.. the sensual is mostly 
in the mind as is all true science.

Richard

Attachment: Blank Bkgrd.gif
Description: GIF image

Reply via email to