OrionWorks wrote:
Unfortunately, as I'm sure you are also well resigned to, your
arguments will do little to change the minds of what appear to be a
number of vocal participants who remain convinced the WTC buildings
were brought down by missiles pre-launched by the jets, combined
with a carefully planned conspiracy that had to have been conceived
and implemented from within the highest echelons of our government.
That brings up another important point. This administration is
incompetent, to say the least. Because they ignored the advice of
experts and made blunder after blunder, they lost the wars in
Afghanistan and Iraq, and they were unable to rescue the people stuck
in New Orleans for several days. They cannot even run a prison in
Baghdad. So why does anyone imagine that this administration is
capable of orchestrating and carrying out the largest deception in
history, and magically persuading thousands of top experts all over
the world to go along with the cover up?
The deceptions that covered up the D-Day landings were much simpler
to carry out than this would be, and they were the biggest, most
sophisticated, best orchestrated and best kept secrets in history.
This administration is particularly inept when it comes to
intelligence and secret tactics. For example, they could not keep it
a secret that they were successfully targeting Al Qaeda terrorists by
tracking cell phones. A spokesman at the White House announced that
fact on national television after the tactic worked once or twice, so
of course the terrorists stopped using cell phones. It is as if after
the Battle of Midway Roosevelt's press secretary had announced to the
world: "We won that battle mainly because we cracked the Japanese
Naval code." (In fact, the Chicago Tribune did publish that fact in
the article soon after the battle, because someone in the Navy leaked
the secret to a reporter. Fortunately, Japanese agents in the U.S.
did not read the article. The administration decided not to bring
charges against the newspaper because that would have meant
testifying about the facts in open court.)
- Jed
- Re: [Vo]: OT: Whoa, Fido.... Jed Rothwell
-
