Jed Rothwell wrote:
Senator Max Cleland ~ Former member of the 9/11 Commission . . .
A good man, but not a structural engineer.
Yes, a good man with enough guts to stand up for injustice where he sees it - and with whom hundreds of structural engineers agree - specifically about the shoddy quality of the rubber-stamp work done by the 9/11 commission and even shoddier NIST work.
It is unconscionable that they would not even have tested for thermite ! which they could do with saved samples - even today.
Col. Robert Bowman, U.S. Air Force, Director of Advanced Space Programs, PhD Aeronautics and Nuclear Engineering "
This guy is the only one on the list competent to judge the NIST study in detail.
Did he conclude the building was brought down by explosives? Then he is a flake with a PhD, like Steve Jones.
Why do we need that kind of comment in a serious discussion? Why the ad hominem?
Hey, if you vehemence here is some kind of show ... say, trying to somehow divorce yourself, as a spokesperson for one controversial subject (LENR) -- from what is perceived to be the far-fringe which accepts all sorts of pathological science -
[am I getting warm?} in the false hope that a show-of-support for the mainstream in this instance will help to somehow legitimize cold fusion ...<g>... by demonstrating that LENR does not attract only a certain type of scientist - then you are not succeeding, IMHO.
Steven Jones, PhD ... and Col. Robert Bowman, USAF Director of Advanced Space Programs, PhD would both - if given the opportunity be very quick and very likely to counter that you are ... well, at least acting like a gullible flake but without a PhD.
Jones
