Nick Palmer wrote:
> Steven A Lawrence wrote:-
>
> <<Actually we're supposed to exercise a bit of restraint on this list and
> not shoot too many holes in theories even if they look like easy
> targets. At least, that's my understanding of the Vortex rules -- it's
> supposed to be a safe place to air ideas which are not fully baked, and
> criticism is supposed to be constructive, if possible, rather than
> destructive>>
>
> Yes, I was (reacting to provocation) rude too. I apologise to Paul. I'll
> still be very surprised if he ever fully "bakes" his idea...
Hi Nick,
No problem and I apologize if I was too candor. It's just the way I am. If I
say fuzzy logic then I don't mean it as a hand slap. If I say something like
"It takes intelligent people to capture energy from ambient temperature" then I
was not suggesting you are unintelligent. Hopefully people now understand my
blunt personality. If I find the need to call any particular person
unintelligent then I won't hesitate.
Now that people know me a little better I hope we can all get along. It seems
there are still two people who aren't talking to me. This seems like high
school revisited.
thomas malloy wrote:
> Correct me if I'm wrong Paul, but you seem to believe that it is
> possible to reverse the 2nd Law with an electromagnetic machine. Nobody
> would be happier than me if yo were to demonstrate such a dingus. OTOH,
> many people have claimed to have done so, but AFAIK, no one has. You may
> have noticed my criticisms of several characters who have made their
> appearance on the FE stage. They include; The Russian Science Fiction
> Author, Alexander Frolov, The Vaporware Merchant, Peter Linderman, The
> Inventor Joseph Newman, The Doctor Tom Bearden. These people have been
> selling their "information" for years, but AFAIK, they have yet to
> demonstrate a working machine. These people are particularly aggravating
> to me because they are IMHO, selling trash. This critique does not apply
> to Chukanov, any researcher into controlled fission or fusion, and
> Mills, who seems to be producing excess energy, and whose explanations
> have a basis in sensible physical theory.
Hi Thomas,
I can't answer for those people, but from the start of my research I've posted
on many forums and displayed an opening message on my peswiki page, "This
project and research requires no funding or payments of any kind. No payment is
requested nor has any ever been accepted for this project and research. This
researcher has the necessary equipment and money to continue this project and
research."
I would not sell anything related to "free energy" until after I've *freely*
published all detailed build instructions. First priority is to give the world
"free energy." If and only then will I *consider* starting a company to design
and sell *improved* "free energy" devices, but I will always allow people to
make their own device. Furthermore, if such a "smoking gun" arrives then I
would encourage people or corporations to freely produce the initial "free
energy" designs for those people who cannot make such a device.
I can show you proof that it's possible to capture energy from ambient
temperature. I'll post this information in a new thread titled "Proof of
capturing ambient temperature energy."
Regards,
Paul Lowrance
