As far as I can tell he couldn't run below a certain pressure, ask him for more details if you're interested, I am not.
Michel ----- Original Message ----- From: "Terry Blanton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Monday, March 05, 2007 10:17 PM Subject: Re: [Vo]: Re: lifter in a accelerating frame > But he seems to have installed it in a bell jar. Whence the ions? > > > > On 3/5/07, Michel Jullian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Borbas believes like many amateur physicists before him that he has >> disproved the ion wind explanation, it's a long story he has been >> multiposting/spamming several dozens of mailing lists with his uninformed >> theory. He doesn't even realize that the air discharge implies an ion >> current, which implies neutrals entrainment i.e. ion wind, this pretty well >> sums it up. >> >> Michel >> >> P.S. Oh yes I had forgotten my promise to Harry below, my comment was that >> mv^2/r for the satellite can be thought of as a centrifugal force or as a >> centripetal acceleration times mass depending on the frame (it changes sign >> while going from the F side to the m*a side), but not as a centripetal force >> as you had put it. The centripetal force here is gravity of course. >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Terry Blanton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> To: <[email protected]> >> Sent: Monday, March 05, 2007 8:14 PM >> Subject: Re: [Vo]: Re: lifter in a accelerating frame >> >> >> > This guy puts his electrodes inside ping pong balls: >> > >> > http://bmiklos2000.freeweb.hu/unipolar.htm >> > >> > Terry >> > >> > On 3/3/07, Harry Veeder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> Unshackle and release the prisoner... >> >> >> >> 2W * 'kV/mm' * 'grams' = 2W * .9 * 100000 = 180000 W = 180 kW >> >> >> >> >> >> Harry >> >> >> >> Michel Jullian wrote: >> >> >> >> > I will only comment when you'll have released the power consumed by the >> >> > 100kg >> >> > lifter ;-) >> >> > >> >> > Michel >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> >
