Yes, but I would put it this way: an infinite force is required to
accelerate a non-light particle to the speed light.

Harry

Dean McGowan wrote:

> Am I incorrect in assuming that a particle travelling at the speed of light
> has infinite mass ?
> 
> 
> Dean
> 
> 
> ----Original Message Follows----
> From: "Michel Jullian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
> To: <vortex-l@eskimo.com>
> Subject: [Vo]: Re: Di-Ozone
> Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2007 21:09:43 +0100
> 
> Sure it is quantized, but this doesn't make it "apparent".
> 
> Michel
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Harry Veeder" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <vortex-l@eskimo.com>
> Sent: Friday, March 16, 2007 8:08 PM
> Subject: Re: [Vo]: Re: Re: Di-Ozone
> 
> 
>> 
>> If light was literally a projectile, then it should be literally subject
>> to the laws of mechanics and momentum changes should vary continuously.
>> However, we know empirically that light of a particular wavelength
>> can only bring about discrete changes of momentum.
>> 
>> 
>> Harry
>> 
>> Michel Jullian wrote:
>> 
>>> Well, it does bounce back from the object (e.g. solar sail) it imparted
>>> momentum to, with total momentum being conserved and all.
>>> 
>>> Michel
>>> 
>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>> From: "Harry Veeder" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>> To: <vortex-l@eskimo.com>
>>> Sent: Friday, March 16, 2007 6:09 PM
>>> Subject: Re: [Vo]: Re: Re: Di-Ozone
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> In my natural philosophy, light has an _apparent_ momentum, because the
>>>> nature of light is such that it refuses to be subjected to a mechanical
>>>> force. (I do mean "refuses" and not simply "resists").
>>>> 
>>>> Harry
>>>> 
>>>> Michel Jullian wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> For a projectile what matters is momentum, and light does have
> momentum,
>>>>> that's what pushes solar sails.
>>>>> 
>>>>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radiation_pressure
>>>>> 
>>>>> Michel
>>>>> 
>>>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>>> From: "R.C.Macaulay" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>>> To: <vortex-l@eskimo.com>
>>>>> Sent: Friday, March 16, 2007 2:03 PM
>>>>> Subject: [Vo]: Re: Di-Ozone
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>>> Howdy Jones,
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> You amaze me with your ability to stretch the elastic of the mind.
> One
>>>>>> must eat a heartly breakfast and tighten the safety belt before
> launching
>>>>>> into one of your posts <grin> that can range from rail guns to
> Ormus... and
>>>>>> that is a stretch.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Now that light has been accepted as having "particle" or "weight", it
> can
>>>>>> be
>>>>>> taken to the next step and think of light having "projectile force"
>>>>>> qualities. A rail gun projectile would not necessarily require a
> socalled
>>>>>> "mass" ( I have always been abhorred by the term mass). A better
>>>>>> constructed
>>>>>> railgun would fire a " projectile of light"... hmmm.. a strange
> beasty
>>>>>> indeed.. Why so ?
>>>>>> Because the projectile could be " tuned" to either/or focus or
> impact.
>>>>>> Strange account of a battle predicted centuries ago where the
> flesh,eyes
>>>>>> and
>>>>>> tongue will rot while they are still standing  ( bones remain) Zec:
> 14.
>>>>>> This
>>>>>> description seeems to indicate a type of a ray gun, however, the
> projectile
>>>>>> does not knock the person off their feet.. only  dissolves the flesh.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> You referred to Barry Carter's Subtleenergy website that mentions a
> new
>>>>>> method of producing O3 and O6 but does not describe the process. He
> does
>>>>>> describe the healing qualities of vortex induced ormus water. Reminds
> me of
>>>>>> the account of the angel that would "stir" or "trouble" the waters in
> the
>>>>>> pool. Whoever would be the first sick person to enter the pool
> thereafter
>>>>>> would be healed.  If the "stirring" means inducing a water vortex and
> only
>>>>>> the first person would be healed, could this mean the vortex was
> destroyed
>>>>>> by entering the pool and the residual remains of the vortex
> properties
>>>>>> dissappear?
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Out in the wildwood behind the Dime Box Saloon lurks an old whisky
> still
>>>>>> left over from the old days. The tale goes that sippin some that "
> thinkin
>>>>>> drinkin" stuff could make a person believe the earth was flat.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Richard
>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
>> 
> 
> 

Reply via email to