Terry Blanton wrote:

But magnets will NOT save the world. Consider this:

There are known recoverable reserves of Rare Earth Elements in the
entire world of approximately 6 million metric tons. . . .

There is not much in ocean water, either: 3.3 ng/kg. More than Pd or Au, but not enough to extract by any practical means. It is about the same as Ag. See:

http://www.agu.org/eos_elec/97025e-table.html

Martin Fleischmann made the same point about Pd many years ago. As I recall the estimated that roughly one third of our energy could be produced from it is a cold fusion. I did a back-of-the-envelope estimate and came up with roughly the same number. This does not depend on how much cold fusion energy one might extract theoretically -- which is not known, in any case. It is clear that you can get quite a lot of energy from a small amount of thin-film palladium, but the limiting factor is how much heat that thin-film Pd or other platinum group metal can withstand. That can be estimated from the amount used in an automotive catalytic converter. They use as little as possible, because these metals are expensive. I extrapolated from the amount of energy produced by automobile engines and the amount of Pd and Pt they now consume, and came up with roughly the same answer as Martin did: about a third, or maybe half.

If this Pd limitation applies, and you cannot produce CF using some common metal such as Ti or Ni, then we would only use Pd for centralized generators. Or, in the case of the Steorn device, we would only use the magnetic generators for large, baseline power generators that run 24 hours a day, like today's uranium fission generators. We would supplement them with existing hydroelectric, natural gas, wind and so on.

However, I think there may be another way to overcome this problem. Assume that CF or the Steorn effect works, and produces very high power density. To some extent, the "recoverable reserves" of any element depends upon the cost of energy. As I indicated above, if you have enough energy to vaporize several cubic square kilometers of ocean water or ordinary rocks, you can recover Ne or other rare elements from these low-density sources. For that matter, you can build rocket engines that are far more efficient than the ones we have today, plus space elevators. From there, you go to the Moon, Mars, the asteroids and various other places in the solar system to prospect for precious metals. 300 GW of Ne-powered rockets is enough to explore the solar system in depth, and bring back megatons of ore -- or perhaps better yet, to refine it on site, and bring back the extracted precious metals only.

There is some debate about how much of these precious metals are available elsewhere in the solar system, but I do not think this matters much. Once you leave the Earth's atmosphere and go to the moon or an asteroid, you can then use raw solar energy to vaporize as much low-grade or as you like, and to separate out precious elements using the kind of energy intensive techniques now used to separate out uranium isotopes.

- Jed

Reply via email to