Actually, John's assessment is correct and there were no ad hominem remarks made by him. You still seem not to have toned down your smug attitude and continue to incite negative responses.
Dave -----Original Message----- From: Michel Jullian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2007 6:14 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [Vo]: Re: No Vo vote Stop the ad hominem please. Michel ----- Original Message ----- From: "John Berry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Thursday, March 22, 2007 1:08 AM Subject: Re: [Vo]: Re: No Vo vote > Your post made my point. > It added Re: which because it is after the {Vo} isn't grouped by subject. > Even worse sometimes a second re: gets added as in: [Vo]: Re: Re: Di-Ozone > or even [VO]:Re:[VO] .. Schauberger > > But mainly subject deletion which is really bad. > If Mark S Bilk's fix works all the better, but for those who want to create > a filter for vortex posts they can just use the To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Anyway I thought you might have toned down the condescending attitude but it > seems not. > > On 3/22/07, Michel Jullian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> Only in your dreams John :) >> >> Michel >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "John Berry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> To: "vortex-l" < [email protected]> >> Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2007 11:02 PM >> Subject: [Vo]: No Vo vote >> >> >> > >Bill: Let's get rid of this crazy "Vo:" adding macro. It does not work! >> >> >> >>- Jed >> > >> > Agreed, let's make this a 'me too!' thread. >> > >> > My understanding is that the person who lobbied to have it added has >> left >> > anyway. >> > >> >> >
