Perhaps Physics Today will carry something in its April issue... Harry
Steven Krivit wrote: I had the pleasure to meet Ms. Sanderson today. If she keeps up her good reporting she may put me out of a job. >From Chicago O'Hare airport... Steve http://blogs.nature.com/thescepticalchymist/2007/03/acs_cold_fusion_anyone.h tml ACS: Cold fusion anyone? Things are winding down here. I just went along to the session on cold fusion (read the story here <http://www.nature.com/news/2007/070326/full/070326-12.html> ), but my expert timing meant that I arrived just in time for the break. Never mind, I was treated to an advance showing of one of the talks yesterday. I have to admit, I was skeptical, but this is pretty cool stuff. As Frank Gordon, one of the cold fusion scientists said to me, "this actually looks like real science" - and he's right. In spite of all the disdain that the field is treated with, the cold fusion people I met were all very positive cheerful people, all completely convinced by their research and with what look like compelling arguments. Even the programme chair for this session (not a cold fusion scientist) told me that he was impressed by the results being presented. He's keeping an open mind on the matter. That's quite a way for the field to come since it was laughed almost out of existence in 1989. Gordon was keen to tell me that since they have been quietly plugging away at their work they have not come under attack in the same way Pons and Fleischmann did. "The silence has been deafening" he said. Cold fusion? I don't know, but the evidence that something weird is happening is there. Maybe it's time to think about this again...
