One of my correspondents, who may wish to remain anonymous, wrote to me:

>I was always uncomfortable whenever conventional Nuclear energy was proposed
>as clean and safe.
>The accidents and close calls and contaminations happen everywhere there is
>Nuclear power, it isn't safe.

I would like to share my response.

Naturally, I have mixed feelings about nuclear power. I think everyone on 
Vortex does -- this is a technically knowledgable group and we all know that a 
large machine can be dangerous, and there are always pros and cons.

Having said that, I have to ask: It isn't safe compared to what? It is lot 
safer than coal, which spews millions of tons of radioactive garbage, and is 
probably destroying the world with global warming. It is safer than oil, which 
pays for terrorism. Okay, it is a more dangerous than wind power, but 
unfortunately there is not enough wind in Georgia or Japan to make a 
significant contribution.

I feel angry at these Japanese managers and technicians partly because they 
have betrayed their profession -- they have betrayed us, and people like 
Mizuno, who trained in nuclear technology. They may even have destroyed the 
future of nuclear power in Japan, which is bad news for global warming. 
Engineers are supposed to tell the truth! And if only they *had* honored the 
truth, and openly reported the problem the first time, the following accidents 
would not have happened. Suppose the first time those rods fell out of the 
stack and into the bottom of the containment vessel they told the regulators, 
told the public, and most important, warned the other operators with the same 
kind of reactor. The problem would have been fixed instead of re-occuring time 
after time, and being covered up.

The sequence of events that destroyed the Three Mile Island reactor happened 
twice before at other plants made by the same company. Twice before the valve 
jammed open and there was no sensor to properly warn the operators. In both 
cases the problem was discovered before it led to serious consequences. A 
low-level NRL regulator took notice, wrote it up, and tried to have the 
equipment and control board modified to keep it from happening again. But no 
one listened, and the third time the problem went all the way and melted about 
a third of the core. If only the information had been brought into the light, 
and taken seriously, the accident never would have happened. It could have been 
avoided easily, with some simple modifications. Keeping these kinds of secrets 
is a violation of ethics of engineering and scientific research, and a horribly 
stupid thing to do.

- Jed



Reply via email to