The truth is that it isn't in any space - 3- or otherwise. There
really is nothing there except what we project/perceive Nth-hand and
draw conjectures from... whoever we are.
As Hui Neng said, "From the first there is Nothing."
P.
At 06:20 PM 4/9/2007, you wrote:
Jones wrote...
It is not clear that Russell's table does not also predict
this particle, nor that quantum "half-spin" is not also a recognition
that this particle e- is never fully in our 3-space.
Even if it is, isn't the "illusion of having fractional charge" a nice
way of telling the mainstream - "hey, you already blew it once, but
we're not going to rub it in just yet, if we get the big prize"?
Is this food-for-thought... or merely time for a 'pepto' to prevent
indigestion?
Howdy Jones,
One must have a huge cup of Texas coffee to sip while digesting a
"Jones moment" and an extemely elastic mind to stretch around
thoughts provoked by such "moments".
Or as Burl Ives quipped (in the movie " The Big Country") to Chuck
Conners... "perhaps there's a side to you I never saw before"<grin>
Good wording,,."never fully in our 3-space". and excellent
wording.. "illusion of having a fractional charge". Knowing how
these thoughts issue forth from that fertile brain of yours is not
as important as the stimulation. As I sit in my rockin' chair on the
front porch of the Dime Box Saloon watching a water vortex
experiment.... and gaze at the water flowing " upward" as it is
flowing downward..while emptying the vessel I can better accept both wordings.
The more we study on it, the less we understand..One of my
favorite science books.. the book of Job.. contains dialogue with
some fellows about the workings of nature and concludes with the
question by God.{ para-phrased by Richard} " if you are so smart.
tell me how I did it".
Richard
