Thomas, so what? Are you saying you have no doubt that man can pollute unchecked and be assured no impact on the climate? Even if you did why should pollution and oil be supported, even in your right wing view of the world shouldn't Oil be given up for an alternative energy? Are you trying to support those evil Arab terrorists who hate your freedom and want to kill you?
Am I 100% convinced by conventional GW, no. But there is a very real chance and I don't believe in fucking with nature for the sake of it and I believe in supporting alternative energy. And despite what someone said the most common topic of this list is alternative energy. (not the only topic) On 4/25/07, thomas malloy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Paul Lowrance wrote: > thomas malloy wrote: > >> Paul Lowrance wrote: >> >>> thomas malloy wrote: >>> > John Berry wrote: >>> >>> I think what you meant to say is that volcanoes have in the past >>> erupted to produce more CO2 than humanity ***for a given >>> duration***. Oddly enough you're missing a huge factor, "Duration." >>> IOW, humanity continues to pump out a steady amount of CO2 year >>> after year. >> >> >> >> No, that's not what the video says, volcanos pump out 10 times as >> much CO2 as all human sources. > > > > Please clarify. You claim that was stated in "An Inconvenient Truth" > narrated by Al Gore? > Among other things, the video says that climate scientists who question man made GW do so at the risk of their career. It mentions volcanic produced gas, it contends that increases in atmospheric CO2 follow increases in ocean temperature. It doesn't mention undersea volcanos, and do we know how many of them there are. In increase in under sea volcanos would cause the deep oceans to warm up. The video does mention that an increase in ocean temperature reduces it's ability to hold CO2. You really should watch the video http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XttV2C6B8pU --- http://USFamily.Net/dialup.html - $8.25/mo! -- http://www.usfamily.net/dsl.html - $19.99/mo! ---
