Yes, the text of the paper, last paragraph of page 6, says Qdischarge = 107C for that charging voltage -0.35V, "roughly the same" as that for -0.3V charging (given as 106.5C at the end of the previous paragraph), plus the moles of D would not be right if it was 170 C (Qdischarge/molesD = Faraday's constant 96500, this is how he finds that moles D = 1.1 × 10^-3 = moles Pd, i.e. that the loading ratio D/Pd is 1)
Michel ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jed Rothwell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[email protected]>; "Michel Jullian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, April 27, 2007 5:21 PM Subject: Re: [Vo]:Old but good paper Michel Jullian wrote: >Thanks for the great digitizing work. A couple >typos in Table 3: 170 should be 107 . . . The original paper says 170. Do you think it is a mistake? >, and 10^3 in "1.1 × 10^3 moles Pd" should be 10^-3 Ah, that's in the footnote below Table 3. The original says 10^3 but that clearly is a mistake. One mole of Pd is 106 grams. - Jed
