there are some choice snippets on freeenergytracker about this. im looking at this quote: "There is a phenomenon known as magnetic viscosity into which little study has been carried out, the study that has been carried out has mainly been to try an overcome it as it is a problem in electric motors generators and other such devices." from a viewer of the lecture, and thinking, hang on, isnt waterhammer, cavitation, resonance, vibration, oscillation and now magnetic viscosity something that is tried to at least dampen by current engineers, because it causes things that are detrimental to a moving device, be it a propeller or a motor. is there a trend here? honest? cos it feels like im seeing glimpses of a trend. something, that happens during motion, that is considered un-worthwhile, not-research-into, and is tried to keep from happening. like cavitation. like resonance. like vibration. and now .. like magnetic viscosity???
gillo_100 goes on about the first rebuttal: He based his whole argument aroud the solidity of CoE and concluded by stating that if the CoE is true that Steorn's proposal must be wrong. And that he for one would not allow even a shred of doubt regarding CoE. This attitude from a supposed academic is disgraceful. How can anyone with 100% confidence state that a particular law always applies completely? Answer: they can't. He also had a few comments about the Question and Answer session at the end of the debate: As I remember only one question was aimed at the lecturers, asking did either have any previous experience of magnetic viscosity, the point Sean was strongly pushing at this stage, neither had. And finally: But what I have learned most from all of this is that they are many who claim to be intelligent but are in fact unbelievably ignorant just because something goes against the grain, this is somthing I really did not expect in an academic environment in modern times. Thanks gillo_100 for the info and your analysis! Hopefully soon someone will track down the video and share it with the rest of us. On 09/05/07, Paul Lowrance <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Some Steorn news. The recent Steorn debate made it on youtube.com video. Sean reminds everyone that threats of physical violence were made by scientists towards Steorn. Read more at http://freeenergytracker.blogspot.com I hope these links are good. You can go to video.google.com and do a search on Steorn and then select "Sort by date." Steorn Part 5 michaeldoyle - 8 min - May 8, 2007 Q&A session with Steorn CEO Sean McCarthy http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EhMc3Xr6htM Steorn Part 3 michaeldoyle - 9 min - May 8, 2007 Academic response to Steorn's perpetual motion machine claims. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9Vwj0A0TWr4 Steorn Part 2 michaeldoyle - 9 min - May 8, 2007 Lecture on Steorn's perpetual motion machine. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y7kKuSHjBbY Steorn Part 4 michaeldoyle - 3 min - May 8, 2007 Academic response to Steorn's perpetual motion machine claims http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OJ7JhlEoL-w Steorn Part 1 michaeldoyle - 9 min - May 8, 2007 Lecture on Steorn's perpetual motion machine. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z9nYyypgNWc Regards, Paul Lowrance
-- ∞
