Michel Jullian wrote:


Kyle kindly proposed to do some more tests, a smoke test with the
rotor blocked and another one without the rotor (and its spindle
bluntes) would be quite instructive!


Yes, I can probably do that in a bit. I'm off now to go deal with some things around the house, etc., but when I get the chance I will try:

1. Smoke test with a blocked rotor.
2. Smoke test with a spinning rotor, maybe backlit this time to see a bit more clearly. Last time I saw almost no motion, but I will try again, it is always possible I missed something before.
3. Smoke test on the outside of the device with a bag over it.
4. Smoke test on the outside of the device in a bag, and held stationary.
5. And I will try it with AC, as Horace requests. Various frequencies of course.

--Kyle

Reply via email to