On Jun 17, 2007, at 4:55 PM, Paul Lowrance wrote:

The challenge is in building a machine that can capture significant ambient energy without building a ridiculously large machine. It will require nano scale technology or darn clever macro scale design. It's the later that I am working on, and will succeed single handedly.

On Jun 17, 2007, at 9:53 PM, Paul Lowrance wrote:


We need more people entering the research of ambient energy machines. Any intelligent person should never trust that you or anyone has everything under control.
[snip]
Again, this yet another plea for people to enter this valid field of research.


On Jun 17, 2007, at 9:35 PM, Paul Lowrance wrote:
Put ones $$$ where their mouth is and I'll hand you a simple device that generates "free energy" without any source of power other than from ambient temperature.


You really should be more consistent in your comments Paul. People will get the impression you are trolling for $$$ or for folks to do your work for you, or benefactors to supply you, rather than struggling to be a genuine contributor. If you will "succeed single handedly", why do you need more people, or ask for money for an impractical device? If you expect to succeed single handedly why are you wasting time here trolling? Go succeed.

If you are only working for humanitarian purposes, post your ideas in detail. Show us something that hasn't been around since Maxwell's time. Let's see your engineering, your numbers. Let's see some specific devices, and some experimental results. Show us how it is done. Teach. If you are working for profit shouldn't you be busy filing for patents and building demonstrators? Good grief, I can imagine how someone funding your efforts would feel about you wasting your time debating instead of working diligently! Your objective appears to be argument and heckling rather than making a genuine contribution to the list, or the art. Prove me wrong! 8^)

Hopefully we won't see the old "persecuted genius" scam emerge from you. It is so boring hearing from yet another genius who sets himself up as an unappreciated persecuted martyr who's only need is an appreciative patron. It is so irritating to watch it happen while real genius, and true contributors to the list, like Ed Storms, work away diligently, without fanfare or adequate funding.

Regards,

Horace Heffner

Reply via email to