Hi Jones, I suggest you write to Dr. Satz: [EMAIL PROTECTED], as he's an expert, as is Prof KVK Nehru, however, the Reciprocal System (RS) is so different from conventional theory that trying to mix it with conventional theory will yield many contradictions.
All particles have a diameter of unit length , but appear to us differently. They are all made up of combinations of rotating photons. If they are squeezed together they spread apart in 3D time. I can say that RS theory can calculate many things that conventional theory can not, such as the lifetime of the neutron and all other particles, sunspot cycle time, G, Plank's constant, chemical bond strength, etc. from fundamental principles. More important to me, however, is that it gives a wonderful philosophical explanation of how the universe actually works ( and it's much simpler than mainstream folks would have us believe ). From the RS perspective, so many things are incorrect with conventional physics -- no big bang, no black holes, no elements above 117, no neutron stars, the sun is powered by the disintegration of heavy elements in the core, the constant 15 femtoG repulsion of the universe subtracting from the gravitational attraction ( accounts for the expansion of the universe and stability of globular clusters) ... Hoyt Stearns Scottsdale, Arizona US -----Original Message----- From: Jones Beene [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 29, 2007 5:09 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [Vo]: Size of the electron Hoyt, > Regarding the size of the electron, Dewey B. Larson's Reciprocal System > has a precise answer: > Diameter = 320.54 Pico meters (same for the neutron). That couldn't be right could it? The Bohr radius is generally said to be .0529 nanometers, or 52.9 picometers, for a diameter of 105.8 pm; and it is actually measurable by several means. Therefore a little over 100 pm is the most probable diameter for monatomic H (i.e. the electron orbital in ground state hydrogen). How does one account for the fact that the diameter of the electron, in the Larson model, would be so much larger than the measured diameter of entire hydrogen atom? I guess the captured electron would shrink due to the charge balancing - but the problem then would be the impossibly large neutron in deuterium ??? (assuming it is also over 300 pm in diameter) Jones
