UPDATED VIDEO FROM JOSEPH NEWMAN:
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-648523340419613894
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
JNPCo/NECorp.
http://www.josephnewman.com
Important video seen at:
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-1610087835473512086&hl=en
* * * * * * *
The phenomenon described by John Hutchison as featured on the Science
Channel, was predicted and demonstrated back in the 1980s ... and
Joseph Newman developed the theory behind the phenomenon beginning in
the 1960s. While Mr. Hutchison demonstrates the levitation
phenomenon, Joseph Newman demonstrated that electromagnetic
levitation phenomenon in the 1980s and, more importantly, he
developed a comprehensive explanation of it before he constructed his
first levitation prototype.
Physicist Dr. Roger Hastings testified to the nature of Joseph
Newman's electromagnetic levitation phenomenon during a
well-documented news conference in Mobile, Alabama in the 1980s.
Included below is an Affidavit prepared by Dr. Hastings describing
how the levitation device can be practically scaled up to enable
humans to lift into outer space without conventional rocketry.
____________________________
AFFIDAVIT
OBSERVATIONS AND PERFORMANCE PROJECTIONS ON
JOSEPH NEWMAN'S ELECTROMAGNETIC AIR/SPACE VEHICLE
I have witnessed a demonstration of Joseph Newman's Electromagnetic
Air and Space Vehicle prototype. It consists of an aluminized helium
balloon wrapped with #38 gauge copper wire. The system is nominally
heavier than air. When the wire coil is connected to a 200 volt
battery, the balloon gradually lifts into the air. It then aligns
with the earth's magnetic field as it rises. If the current is cut
off, the balloon immediately begins to fall. If the current
direction is reversed, the balloon rotates to align with the earth's
field. The balloon can be made to rotate or oscillate by manipulating
the direction of current flow. If the current is periodically
switched so that the balloon always repels the earth's field, its
rate of descent is about 25% faster than the case of steady
attraction of the coils to the earth's field.
Joseph Newman's design calls for creation of a magnetic field which
is an average about equal to the earth's field over the volume of the
balloon. This can be achieved with minimum input power using a large
number of turns of fine wire. I have considered vehicle modules with
the following properties:
Volume = 10'x10'x10' = 1,000 cubic feet
Helium Lift = 70 lbs.
Wire = 12,000 turns of #38 AWG copper
Wire Weight = 23 lbs.
Battery = 3,000 volts DC
Battery Weight = 15 lbs
DC Current = 10 mA
Material Weight = 10 lbs.
Payload Weight = 22 lbs.
A vehicle which is 100 feet in diameter and 50 feet high would
consist of 400 of the above cubes and would carry a payload of 4.4
tons. A vehicle which is 1,000 feet in diameter and 500 feet high
would consist of 400,000 of these cubes and carry a payload of 4,400
tons.
The following points should be noted:
(1) The total payload is proportional to vehicle volume.
(2) The electromagnetic torque and lift are also proportional to
volume in this design.
(3) Navigation is achieved by manipulating the orientation of the coils.
(4) If superconducting wires become available, the batteries would
not be required.
(5) For improved efficiency with copper wiring, sets of the cubes can
be connected in series and energized with pulsed high voltage.
Joseph Newman has developed such techniques to extend battery
lifetime.
(6) In the atmosphere, lift is provided by a combination of ohmic
heating of the helium gas, electromagnetic interaction of the helium
atoms with the applied fields, and interaction of the applied
magnetic field with the earth's magnetic field.
(7) It is intended that the craft can operate entirely through
interaction with the earth's magnetic field once it leaves the
atmosphere. The interaction will be especially strong in the
ionosphere and persists in the earth's magnetotail.
Joseph Newman's invention was designed and disclosed in a patent
application to its construction. It represents a vastly improved
means for propulsion and navigation of helium balloons (blimps).
Large versions may well carry us gently and safely into space.
Dr. Roger Hastings, Ph.D. [Signed and Notarized]
Physicist
ABOUT THE AUTHOR:
Dr. Roger Hastings has a Ph.D. in Physics, University of Minnesota,
1975; MS in Physics, University of Denver,
1971; BS in Physics, University of Denver, 1969.
Dr. Hastings was a Postdoctoral Fellow at the University of Virginia,
1977-77 with research in organic superconductors and the physical
properties of solutions of macroions and viruses. Dr. Hastings has
been a Principal Physicist with the UNISYS Corporation. As a
consultant, Dr. Hastings also designs electric motors for other
corporations.
_______________________________________
"Just as a long-legged spider can lift itself from the surface of a
pond by dispersing its body weight over a wide area upon the
molecular surface tension of the water, so too, by analogy, can a
vehicle lift itself from the surface of the planet by dispersing a
magnetic field over a wide area upon the planet's magnetic field."
--- Joseph Newman
_______________________________________
LETTER FROM COL. THOMAS BEARDEN:
The following is the original letter from Thomas Bearden regarding
energy machine inventor Joseph Newman's pioneering work:
"Mr. Newman is a successful inventor with patented, marketed
inventions. He is level-headed, sober, sane, and reliable. Further,
he does have a very good Theory to explain what he has done. Many
Doctors of Physics and Doctors of Electrical Engineering have already
visited him, seen and tested the Motor, examined his Theory, and come
away convinced that Joe Newman has what he says he has.
"As one might expect, the patent commissioners' responses have
been totally inappropriate. Joe Newman has yet to have a fair shake,
and he certainly deserves a patent, simply on the credentials of the
scientists and engineers who have already examined the device and
testified that it works.
"Newman's machine is clean as a newborn baby and non-polluting.
In production it will be simple, cheap, practical, and imminently
affordable by the average person.
"For that very reason, the entire massive energy cartel and
control groups of the world are arrayed against him. They will see to
it that Newman is destroyed unless powerful assistance and
countermeasures are taken immediately. As you so well understand, Joe
Newman doesn't have a TECHNICAL problem; he has a POLITICAL problem."
----- THOMAS BEARDEN, 1984
_______________________________________
There are individuals who have copied the work of Joseph Newman and
in some cases have attempted to claim it as their own ---
The following is quoted from the January-February, 1986 issue of
INFINITE ENERGY NEWSLETTER, Volume 1, Number 7, written by Gary
Kring, NEF President, page 13:
"...I received a xeroxed copy of an article in LET'S TALK
MAGAZINE, a publication of radio station KABC in Los Angeles, send to
me by NEF members, Mr. and Mrs. Raymond Hay. The article was written
by Bill Jenkins, the host of the "Open Mind Show." A year or so ago,
Jenkins had interview a theoretical physicist named Tom Bearden on
his program. "We were discussing Nikola Tesla and T. Henry Moray,"
writes Jenkins, "and the very real prospect of today's science
finally being able to achieve what those physicists had sone years
ago: tap an energy source which was limitless and free."
"John Bedini, a young designer of audio devices and speakers, was
listening to the program. Impressed with Bearden's ideas, Bedini
began tinkering with his own energy multiplication device. After long
conversations with Bearden of Alabama on the phone and much testing,
Bedini was sure he had a device that put out more energy than it took
in.
"Mr. Bedini had not wanted to patent the device but rather make
it immediately available to the people of the world. When radio host,
Bill Jenkins, got word of the device, he sent Dr. Patrick Flanagan,
an electronics genius in his own right, to test it. "It worked," says
Jenkins. "He had successfully developed a device that literally draws
upon the free electrons which swirl around us, all the time, and
harnessed them into doing work.
"Seeking to understand more about the nature of this alleged
'free energy' device, I read the text of a speech by Thomas Bearden,
titled, 'Toward a New Electromagnetics,' as it appeared in an edition
of Energy Unlimited. Bearden states that 'the universe is filled with
fantastic amounts of anenergy; ultimately, that is what the universal
vacuum is.' Anenergy, Bearden defines as a flow or flux of virtual
particles -- bringing to mind Joseph Newman's concept of gyroscopic
particles." (end of quote from INFINITE ENERGY NEWSLETTER)
__________________________________________________________________
The point of the above information is that Bedini apparently
"learned" how to construct such a device from Mr. Bearden. Mr.
Bearden in turn apparently "learned" how to build such a device from
two gentlemen (friends of Bearden) whom he sent from Huntsville,
Alabama to visit Joseph Newman and see a working prototype in the
early months of 1984 --- we have a photograph of their visit with
Joseph Newman. Those two gentleman reported back to Mr. Bearden as to
how Joseph Newman's machine operated. One could easily hypothesize as
to why Bedini wasn't interested in patenting the invention in the
1980s: it wasn't his to patent in the first place.
Joseph Newman had originally filed a patent application five years
earlier (before 1984). And that patent application was, in turn,
based upon more than 14 years of research and experimentation by
Joseph Newman dating back to the mid-1960s.
Moreover, Thomas Bearden's "anerergy particles" --- Joseph Newman's
gyroscopic particles [a.k.a. "gyroscopic massergies"] ---
specifically originate from the magnetic fields generated in the coil
and magnet rotor of Joseph Newman's Motor/Generators. Joseph Newman
has described that mechanical process in great detail in his
fundamental book.
Joseph Newman has described his technology as "producing greater
external energy output than external energy input." [EEO>EEI]
That occurs in accordance with the concept that "energy cannot be
created or destroyed --- only converted from one form to another." It
is PRECISELY for that reason that he originally began his pioneering
research in the mid-1960s. And, since his technology does indeed
produce greater external energy output than external energy input, it
represents a fundamental corroboration of the First Law of
Thermodynamics and extends the concept into the ELECTROMAGNETIC
"conversion"* of mass to energy.
*Actually, in a very fundamental sense, it is incorrect to claim that
mass is "converted" into energy. Operationally speaking, the
fundamental units are TRANSFERRED from one domain in the universe to
another. Such fundamental units are simultaneously "mass" and
"energy".
To further explain ---
Joseph Newman has never called his pioneering technology either
"free-energy" or "zero-point-energy". The term "free-energy" is
actually scientifically inappropriate: the technology is neither
"free" in an economic sense NOR in a scientific sense. Why? Because:
1) It does cost SOME amount of resources/money to build a unit and,
2) The energy output DOES have to come from somewhere --- in this
case from the atomic domains of the copper conductor.
The correct way to view the technology is that Joseph Newman is
transferring gyroscopic massergies (originally termed gyroscopic
particles by Joseph Newman) from one domain in the universe to
another. Another way to describe the technology (as stated above) is
to say that the energy machine "generates greater external energy
output than external energy input" (EEO>EEI).
I will make the following statement and THEN I will "correct it":
The Newman Motor/Generator converts mass to energy
ELECTROMAGNETICALLY rather than through nuclear fission or fusion.
The above statement will enable someone not familiar with the
technology to better understand what is happening.
Now I will correct or, more accurately, "refine" the above statement:
Actually, mass is never "converted" to energy. Why? Because "mass"
and "energy" are not only equivalent but such terminology represents
two macroscopic manifestations of the SAME phenomena.
The fundamental unit of the universe is the gyroscopic massergy.
All atoms and all subatomic particles are composed of combinations of
gyroscopic massergies. The gyroscopic massergy "perpetually" spins at
"c" (the speed of light) and moves in some direction at "c". Thus,
the gyroscopic massergy is the mechanical equivalent of Einstein's
equation of e = mc^2. However, the gyroscopic massergy is not "mass"
one instant and then "energy" the next instant. The gyroscopic
massergy is simply what it IS: it is something that is simultaneously
BOTH mass AND energy.
It is how WE perceive it at different times that WE choose to
describe it as either "energy" or "mass". But, from the gyroscopic
massergy's perspective it is what it is --- and NEVER changes its
mechanical behavior.
It is therefore correct to say that gyroscopic massergies are
physically TRANSFERRED (not "converted") from one domain or location
in the universe to another. When they are operating in one location
(as within the atomic domains of the copper conductor), WE choose to
call them "mass". When they are physically transferred to another
location (as moving down the length of the copper conductor), WE
choose to call them "energy". But they, themselves, are unchanging in
their fundamental mechanical behavior and cannot be created nor
destroyed.
Thus, Joseph Newman does not subscribe to the "ZPE" concept: that the
energy produced by his Motor/Generator comes from the "aether".
The source of the gyroscopic masserges ARE the atomic domains of the
copper conductor within his energy machine.
The true pioneer of this revolutionary technology is Joseph Newman.
_______________________________________
"The Theory I propose may ... be called a Theory of the
Electromagnetic Field because it has to do with the space in the
neighborhood of the electric or magnetic bodies, AND IT MAY BE CALLED
A DYNAMICAL THEORY, BECAUSE IT ASSUMES THAT IN THAT SPACE THERE IS
MATTER IN MOTION, BY WHICH THE OBSERVED ELECTROMAGNETIC PHENOMENA ARE
PRODUCED." --- JAMES CLERK MAXWELL
