Paul, the Vortex-L web archive automatically hides addresses given in the text of messages, cf: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg20909.html
Further, as Horace correctly pointed out, the particular address [EMAIL PROTECTED] you accused him of disseminating to this list's hypothetical spammers has been publicized in an unhidden form on several web pages, see: http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=eresrch%40eskimo.com&btnG=Google+Search So kindly stop going on about this, you seem to fail to realize you're boring us all to death. Michel ----- Original Message ----- From: "Paul Lowrance" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Wednesday, July 18, 2007 5:56 PM Subject: Re: [Vo]:Banned from Steorn > OrionWorks wrote: > > Paul, > > > > ...whose email address is clearly displayed in all my vortex-l > > messages every-single-time as: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" > > > Try this logic --> By my choice I submit to Vortex-l. Dr. Mike has not > submitted > his email to this list. People should not submit another persons email > address > without permission. The lack of foresight, and dim consciousness found in > nearly > every human being is rather frightening. It's no wonder an entire so-called > civilized country of so-called humans can support a war of killing. You > people > can't get past your emotions, which passively dominate your consciousness. > You > continue to kill each other, cycle after cycle, and time after time you find > what I refer to as fuzzy logic to justify your actions, referring to such > wars > as defense or preemptive strike. > > Please wake up! > > > > > For someone who claims he is in pursuit of the "truth", that his > > motivations are driven by pure logic I find it incredibly > > contradictory for you to express the amount of LOLing that you do when > > you disagree with the opinions of others. > > > Indeed, because one needs to be light of heart to view such darkness within > humanity. I've discovered that people dominated by the passive emotional ego > become infuriated when they cannot strike emotions in another person who > returns > their emotions with a so-called smirky smile. My study reveals that people > become more and more emotionally upset until they can at least spark some > form > of emotions in the person. ... My LOL's really bother you, don't they. All I > can > say is Sorry, but I'll continue being happy thank you very much. > > It's my firm belief you people are utterly dominated by emotions, which the > east > has rightfully identified and referred to as one's own self demons. > > > > > > It suggests on the surface a massive ego > > > I'll be more than happy to debate with you to see if you can prove your > claims > that I am egotistical, but I already know your so-called logic has more holes > than Swiss cheese, and IMHO you believe (more like feel) you are correct > because > you desire (an emotion) it to be so. Such a debate in all likelihood will > bare > very little fruit, accomplish next to nothing while wasting a great deal of > time. After a lifetime of being correct nearly 100% of the time I can safely > say > that my words (not my opinions) are based on truth and are justified. If you > only knew my actions, my history, and me then you would see how silly your > words > are. > > > > > > that constantly needs to > > reassert its personal concept of superiority by dismissing the > > opinions of others - by all that LOLing you constantly express > > directly in their face. It comes across as one gigantic bluff tactic. > > Who are you trying to fool? > > > > IMO, you might come across more sincerely and with greater integrity > > and respect if you were to tone down the amount of posturing that you > > tend to indulge in, particularly when in disagreement with the > > opinions of others. > > > > By all means, feel free to disagree with the opinions of others. We > > all do. I certainly do. > > > > I certainly haven't agreed with how you have been going about > > expressing a lot of your opinions lately. I've kept those personal > > opinions to myself – until now. > > > You offer zero proof. > > > > > > PS: Your last concluding comment to Horace where you say: > > > >> BTW, let me know when you want continue our debate > >> on capturing ambient energy so I can educate (LOL) > >> you on some fundamental physics. > > > > ...reveals a very shallow, petty and manipulative attitude. Very > > arrogant. There is little room for the pursuit of "truth" or the > > pursuit of pure logic when one allows themselves to be consumed by > > such behaviors. > > > My "LOL" in "I can educate (LOL)" was between Horace and I. Horace gets it. > It > appears you have no clue what the "LOL" truly meant in this case. My LOL was > a > reflection of a sentence Horace has repeatedly posted recently. > > > > > Regards, > Paul Lowrance >
