I think you are very close on this, and of course it can be seen on the meters although the photo is not that clear for the meters. The meter on the right is outlet#2 and has a calibration error of +.2 DP (Dew Point) and of course RH% which has less interest until you factor in the temp.
The goal of the device is indeed a water vapor diverter, yet the temp increase doe not match well with the energy calculated by the vapor difference, so you are correct in part, yet I may still have calculation errors. -----Original Message----- From: Michel Jullian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, July 21, 2007 8:54 AM To: [email protected] Subject: [Vo]:Re: Maxwell's Demon, naw! Photo is nice but captions/diagrams would be welcome. Water vapor condensation heat could be involved if the two outlets have different humidity. Michel ----- Original Message ----- From: "Stiffler Scientific" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Saturday, July 21, 2007 3:23 PM Subject: RE: [Vo]:Maxwell's Demon, naw! > Here is a like to one of the first setups that showed a T increase. > > http://www.stifflerscientific.com/images/dd01.jpg > > THis may help in showing the basic approach. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Stiffler Scientific [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Saturday, July 21, 2007 8:10 AM > To: Vortex-L > Subject: [Vo]:Maxwell's Demon, naw! > > > Maxwell's Demon, How to know he is working? > > Ambient Ta ~ 23.5 'C (input air temp) > > Air pump @ 4 PSIG, adds ~ 0.5 'C to air temp., giving working air temp of Tq > = 24 'C > > Outlet (1) T1 = 24 'C > Outlet (2) T2 = 24.6 'C (Demon door installed) > > > Outlet 1&2 are both @ 4 PSIG and only difference is the Demon door? > > Outlet 1 & 2 reach equilibrium with ambient when pump is off (no air flow). > > All instruments are calibrated to NIST standards and Outlet 1 & 2 will reach > equilibrium with ambient with no air flow. No obstructions exist in outlets, > except for Temperature and Humidity probes (all the same in each tube). The > outlet ports are at the same elevation above test bench. > > What is suggested to insure that the Demon may indeed be present? > > Will be trying a cascade of the setup to see if the +0.6 'C can indeed be > increased to a total of +1.2 'C by the addition of the second unit. At the > present insulations is not being employed. > > Any suggesting on what should be tried to determine the anomalous increase > in temperature? I would think that if it was the Demon that the outlet (1) > temp should be Tq - 0.6 = T1 ~ 23.4 which is not the case. I would think > that if the Demon was at work that cooling should also be seen. > > So that vorts time is not wasted, I will welcome suggestion via private mail > on how the experiment might be monitored so that this strange difference can > be found. Unless found to be a stupid measurement error and vorts want > additional info I will supply a link to the test data. >
