----- Original Message ----- From: "Jones Beene" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Friday, July 27, 2007 4:20 PM Subject: Re: [Vo]: Pantone Mods
> Michel, > > What do you think of the Quant'homme site? Hi Jones, it's a big site and it looks messy to me, I looked at a few of the direct links you provided but all I can gather is that engines have been modified (they show photos and diagrams), I couldn't find for what purpose (more mileage presumably?) and with which results. Could you find any before/after mileage data as opposed to enthusiastic talk and mod diagrams? > Certainly not peer reviewed (unless you are a Mec ;-) > but promising and > indicative of something, no? For now I'll have to take your word for it :) Michel > > Moving on to the "next step" in a progression towards 100 MPG, Horace > suggested: > > > Suppose the junk in the water were pyrolized in the water to obtain > water gas (CO + H + other things) using a generator on the motor > (already there in a hybrid) for arc power. > > Yes. I thought of that too (applying a few kWe from the electrical > system - at the tank itself) but not an arc and not "pyrolysis" per se, > which requires too high a temperature - > > ...and there is perhaps an easier additional way to get the benefit. > > > It would be possible to feed ground up wood, charcoal, vegetable > oils, Algoil, garbage, all kinds of things into the fuel tank then. > Anything unburned in the exhaust would be recycled by passing the > exhaust through the water-fuel. > > Yup, they have been doing that to some extent already. There is a > possible refinement of the above: at the tank - one can use straight 12 > volt AC from the alternator to do the "aqua-gen" thing - which is not > simply passing current through the muck ... but doing so via the synergy > of using carbon based electrodes, which are slightly consumable. > > In the event of the far future - and having no oil at all, we could make > the electrodes from compressed coal dust or charcoal (from biomass). The > advantage of this over Fischer-Tropsch is that no extra CO2 is produced > to get the H2, so carbon is maximized. > > And there is one more additional thing which can be added. In the > reactor tube itself - make it of porous nickel so that it would pass > hydrogen but not CO2, nitrogen, or steam. To release some hydrogen from > the hot exhaust, one could set up a standing wave of RF down the axis of > this exhaust tube - maybe at a frequency of about 1640 Mhz which is the > resonance point of the OH radical. > > Some H2 gas is separated there, and passes through the tube and into the > intake flow coming the other direction from the water tank. When some of > the H2 interacts with recycled CO2, prior to intake, you get CO and OH > and other goodies to reburn. The largest advantage of any enhanced > Pantone system could be on the oxidizer side, plus the higher flame > speed and mobility of a small addition of H2. > > However, none of this may be needed with a highly catalytic reactor > tube. I doubt that many of the mods have actually plated Pd or Pt as a > catalyst. That is expensive - but hey - maybe then you also get a small > LENR or hydrino effect! > > Jones >
