Not a pretty picture. One note, officials have denied that the
resurfacing of the bridge had anything to do with the failure; so, you
know what *that* probably means.
Terry wrote,
Nope, it had absolutely nothing to do with the fact that the bridge
was being resurfaced:
Howdy Terry,
I looked at the inspection reports you posted. At best the truss materials
were an "erector set". Surprised me the bridge was a 1960 model.. I thought
it was a 1938. dont know where I got that idea. The structural engineer that
has his name on this problem will live with it.
Richard
