>>> 1) 3-space + time (Heisenberg assumption) >>> 2) 2-space + time (Mills assumption) >>> 3) 2-space + 2-time (alternative QM time dimensional variable) > >> There is another view out there. A vort member has done a number of lectures >> on 2-space +0 time. I did get in on part of one and it was very interesting >> how it explained QM in a simple 2-space view. Maybe they (he) will comment >> on this? > >Are you referring to Max Tegmark's page, or Blaze Labs, or Frank Grimer >or someone else?
I must apologize for speaking out of turn. I looked best I could and now see the subject was not discussed on vortex, yet the presenter is a vort? The lecture was paid for by my employer and they would be ticked if I told the world who lectures for us. The best I can do is the time was in Mar. 2006 and was on Dark Matter, Heat and Gas. I did a web search and found nothing, so sorry I spoke out of turn. -----Original Message----- >From: Jones Beene <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Sent: Aug 9, 2007 10:45 AM >To: [email protected] >Subject: Re: [Vo]:The meaning of ... > >[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >>> 1) 3-space + time (Heisenberg assumption) >>> 2) 2-space + time (Mills assumption) >>> 3) 2-space + 2-time (alternative QM time dimensional variable) > >> There is another view out there. A vort member has done a number of lectures >> on 2-space +0 time. I did get in on part of one and it was very interesting >> how it explained QM in a simple 2-space view. Maybe they (he) will comment >> on this? > >Are you referring to Max Tegmark's page, or Blaze Labs, or Frank Grimer >or someone else? >
