No less promising than Bendini. Let us know. Glad you have the time! Terry
On 8/16/07, Jones Beene <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hold the presses ... > > After 150 years, the lead-acid battery may be poised to be reborn as > Prime Mover, and yours-truly may be an early witness, thanks to a Vo > lurker. Lots of activity in this niche lately. > > BTW - if you have not seen it, here is the YouTube video of the power > supply (battery array) for Aaron's electrolysis cell, which is said to > have inspired the experiment. > > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mUGa2jiYeSI > > In this ongoing replication attempt, a similar 4 battery array has > reportedly already delivered approximately double the rated amp-hours, > yet was operating at higher voltage than it started with, and is still > going strong. Of course, the batteries could been damaged from having > given up too much chemical energy... or the ubiquitous 'measurement > error' has not been ruled out. > > This is not my experiment (wish it was); but let's hope that it is > repeatable by others, and that the inventor will allow a full report > and/or open-sourcing, should the results hold. > > The lab is close enough that I am headed over there as soon as possible. > If this is to be yet another disappointment and false alarm, then that > kind of "deflation" seems to be the downside risk of life-on-the-edge of > mainstream science, as it were. 'Cutting-edge' or 'bleeding-edge' ... > the POV difference is like the cup being half-full or half-empty. > > Jones > > >
