Pardon me, cancer rates in general, and yes i can. ill go digging. im actually not sure about bone marrow in particular. I'll have to check on that.
On 8/25/07, Stephen A. Lawrence <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Bone marrow cancer rates correspond to poverty rates? I was not aware > of that. Can you provide a reference? > > Many diseases, including most significantly heart disease, hit the poor > and uneducated harder (and hit U.S. citizens harder than citizens of > most other countries -- draw your own conclusions). Diseases which are > correlated with poor, crowded conditions, such as TB, also tend to hit > the poor harder. And many diseases show a tendency to hit particular > races harder than other races, independent of educational or economic > background, which provides another bit of confusion in societies which > are more or less segregated. > > But I was not aware that bone marrow cancer showed such a correlation. > > leaking pen wrote: > > Correspondence is NOT causality. the numbers also match up with > > poverty figures, and guess where most high power lines run? through > > the poorer areas. there are too many factors at play. until i see a > > study with lab animals kept near replicas of high power lines, i pass > > it off. > > > > On 8/24/07, Horace Heffner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >> Here's report not yet suppressed and not yet discredited: > >> > >> > >> http://tinyurl.com/27uyfv > >> > >> http://www.sciencedaily.com/upi/index.php? > >> feed=Science&article=UPI-1-20070824-00462200-bc-australia-powerlines.xml > >> > >> > >> Horace Heffner > >> http://www.mtaonline.net/~hheffner/ > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > -- That which yields isn't always weak.
