On Aug 28, 2007, at 1:08 PM, Jones Beene wrote:



For whatever reason, many experts seem to be marginalizing the Dufour (Spence) ideas, which are ironically based on mainstream underpinning (QED) when nothing else in LENR is based on such a firm theoretical footing.


The idea of a low energy bound hydrex, faux neutron, hydrino, blah blah blah, acting like a neutron and drifting through the cloud of electrons about the uranium atom is simply not credible. The binding energy is too small. It's like trying to hold down a roof in a tornado with an ordinary rubber band.

Horace Heffner
http://www.mtaonline.net/~hheffner/



Reply via email to