"Tetrode Kink" is moderately explained about a third
of the way down this page.

http://www.vacuumtubes.net/How_Vacuum_Tubes_Work.htm

It is a problem for radio transmission, but because
"negative resistance" has beneficial connotation for
free energy, even if it is only "differential negative
resistance" then one wonders if this "feature" can be
put to use in a multi-electrode electrolysis cell.

After all, "extra" electrons should be beneficial to
generating hydrogen. Of special interest would be
converting a Mizuno type of glow discharge
electrolysis cell into a multi-electrode affair, which
can benefit from not only LENR (if it is there) but
also the output can be enhanced by higher levels of
hydrogen generation by the redesign. 

A marriage made in OU-Heaven? 

Not quite yet - forgot to add the multipactor part to
Horace's tetrode. 

Since secondary electron emission should be even more
beneficial on the *backside* of the anode, then why
not go the extra mile and expedite that with a
multipactor? (of the original Farnsworth variety, not
the more modern usage). The former anode now becomes a
neutral plate.

In the Mizuno arrangement there is a central cathode
surrounded by an anode which can be a tubular wall.
Now we add two grids between cathode and anode, and
put the whole thing into another cylinder which
becomes the real anode. With proper sealing, one could
even use two types of electrolytes - for instance, a
base like KOH in the tetrode gap (the "front side")
and sulfuric acid on the back side. 

Therefore the anode would be constructed of two layers
of differing work function or other emissive property
(perhaps by nitriding or anodizing only one side of
the (former) anode, which is now a neutral (or nearly
neutral) plate.

Technically this would now be considered either a
pentrode, or else a tetrode in series with a diode.
The two grids can be still be heterodyned or linked in
some kind of resonant loop. 

More later, as my laptop is losing charge and this
WiFi connection may not reach cyberspace anyway.

Jones

Reply via email to