>
> Jones wrote:
>
> > http://newenergytimes.com/tgp/2007TGP/2007TGP-Report.htm
> ...
> > Seriously, the bulk of this data cannot be attributed to
> anything but nuclear reactions, can it?
>
> Talking about those CR-39 plastic chips tests, whether directly in
> the electrolyte, or with an
> intervening thin Mylar film, the DIESECF hypothesis predicts much
> more nuclear activity where the Pd
> cathode lightly touches the insulator (bottom of wire and tips of
> those of the codeposited PdDx
> dendrites that touch the plastic) than where the electrolyte gap
> is larger (sides and top of wire).
>
> Unfortunately I don't see how this can be proved, as any particles
> having gone through a large water
> gap wouldn't have enough energy left to make a track anyway,
> whether they exist or not.... :(
>
> Michel
>
Maybe Bubble Technology Industries can help? ...
<<BTI regularly provides custom radiation and explosives detection products for our clients’ special applications. Please contact us at [EMAIL PROTECTED] to discuss your requirements.>>
http://www.bubbletech.ca/custom_products.html
